Table 3.

Results of multivariable logistic regressions of use of modern contraceptive methods among married women age 15–49 in Haiti

Variables	Urban		Rural
	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Level of availability of multiple family planning methods
Low availability	1.00		1.00
Medium availability	1.77**	1.19 to 2.63	1.73**	1.23 to 2.45
High availability	2.01**	1.33 to 3.05	2.23*	1.61 to 3.09
Age
15–24	1.00		1.00
25–34	0.78	0.54 to 1.13	1.04	0.83 to 1.31
35–44	0.52**	0.33 to 0.81	0.81	0.61 to 1.06
45–49	0.25*	0.13 to 0.47	0.29*	0.20 to 0.42
Number of living kids
0–1	1.00		1.00
2–3	2.10*	1.54 to 2.86	2.70*	2.15 to 3.38
4–5	1.78**	1.15 to 2.75	3.32*	2.52 to 4.37
6+	2.27**	1.23 to 4.20	3.19*	2.32 to 4.38
Education
None	1.00		1.00
Primary	1.08	0.71 to 1.64	1.09	0.91 to 1.31
Secondary or higher	1.02	0.65 to 1.61	1.13	0.87 to 1.46
Occupation
Unemployed	1.00		1.00
Agriculture	1.07	0.57 to 2.02	1.27	0.98 to 1.63
Professional	1.23	0.93 to 1.63	1.28**	1.08 to 1.52
Other	1.76	0.97 to 3.18	1.17	0.67 to 2.04
Wealth Quintile†
Lowest	na		1.00
Second	na		0.93	0.78 to 1.11
Middle	na		1.01	0.80 to 1.29
Lowest-Middle	1.00		na
Fourth	0.86	0.63 to 1.18	1.22	0.83 to 1.79
Highest	0.64***	0.43 to 0.93	0.77	0.40 to 1.46
Religion
Catholics	1.00		1.00
Protestant	0.79	0.61 to 1.02	0.78**	0.67 to 0.92
Vaudousant/other	0.58	0.32 to 1.05	0.94	0.70 to 1.25
Exposure to family planning messages
No exposure	1.00		1.00
Weekly or more	0.91	0.71 to 1.17	1.03	0.88 to 1.20
Contact with family planning provider
No	1.00		1.00
Yes	1.89*	1.45 to 2.46	1.82*	1.55 to 2.13
Random parameter	0.06		0.10
Number of women	1216		3826
Number of clusters	85		241

***P<0.001; **P<0.01; *P<0.05.

†In non-metropolitan urban areas, very few women were in the lowest and second wealth quintiles, and they were combined into the middle wealth group.