Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Apr 23;28(7):1238–1245. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1235

Table 2.

Estimates of Variance Explained by Imputed Variants in Four Functional Groups

Above mean LD
Below mean LD
Row sum s.e. No. Variants (%) Sub-category sum s.e.
Est s.e. Est s.e.
Coding MAF < 0.01 0.002 0.022 0.004 0.029 0.005 0.036 103,133 (0.6%) 0.010 0.039
MAF ≥ 0.01 0.005 0.009 0 0.014 0.005 0.017 50,753 (0.3%)

Intergenic MAF < 0.01 0.033 0.036 0 0.059 0.033 0.063 4,305,707 (26.6%) 0.060 0.068
MAF ≥ 0.01 0 0.015 0.027 0.026 0.027 0.030 4,220,706 (26.1%)

Intronic MAF < 0.01 0.042 0.037 0 0.055 0.042 0.061 3,173,417 (19.6%) 0.124 0.066
MAF ≥ 0.01 0.009 0.014 0.074 0.025 0.082 0.028 2,856,226 (17.6%)

Regulatory MAF < 0.01 0 0.024 0 0.036 0 0.043 746,866 (4.6%) 0.018 0.045
MAF ≥ 0.01 0.0002 0.009 0.018 0.014 0.018 0.016 676,634 (4.2%)

Abbreviations: LD, linkage disequilibrium; Est, estimate; s.e., standard error.