Table 2.
Treatments | FI2, g/d per bird | BWG2, g/d per bird | FCR2, g feed/g gain |
---|---|---|---|
Control | 18.40ab | 6.29 | 2.92ab |
Antibiotic3 | 18.32b | 6.45 | 2.84b |
T200 | 18.61a | 6.14 | 3.03a |
T300 | 18.47ab | 6.20 | 2.98 a |
T400 | 18.24b | 6.39 | 2.82b |
P-value4 | 0.035 | 0.168 | 0.009 |
SEM | 0. 089 | 0.107 | 0.045 |
P-value for contrasts4 | |||
Control vs. antibiotic | 0.951 | 0.785 | 0.623 |
Control vs. T200 | 0.373 | 0.780 | 0.372 |
Control vs. T300 | 0.962 | 0.945 | 0.829 |
Control vs. T400 | 0.619 | 0.958 | 0.479 |
Antibiotic vs. T200 | 0.116 | 0.191 | 0.028 |
Antibiotic vs. T300 | 0.650 | 0.363 | 0.140 |
Antibiotic vs. T400 | 0.950 | 0.990 | 0.997 |
1All data are average of 5 replicates.
2FI = feed intake; BWG = BW gain; FCR = feed conversion ratio.
3Antibiotic is 100 ppm flavophospholipol. T200, T300, and T400 indicate the levels of 200, 300, and 400 ppm of Thymus vulgaris essential oil.
4Significance level (P < 0.05) by 95% confidence interval.
abDifferent superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) within the same column.