Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 14;18(2):2034–2042. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10477

Table I.

Characteristics of AML1/ETO+ patients with or without EML.

Characteristics EML+ EML P-value
No. of patients 36 87
Male/female, n 26/10 46/41 0.048
Median age (range), years 30.5 (2–69) 25.0 (3–74) 0.295
Median WBC (range), ×109 cells/l 21.7 (1.8–79.3) 13.6 (1.1–85.8) 0.059
C-KIT mutation, n (%)a
  Positive   9 (39.1) 14 (23.7) 0.163
  Negative 14 (60.9) 45 (76.3)
FLT3-ITD, n (%)a
  Positive 1 (4.3) 2 (3.4) 0.836
  Negative 22 (95.7) 57 (96.6)
Expression of APP gene, n (%)
  High 11 (91.7) 20 (41.7) 0.019
  Low 1 (8.3) 28 (58.3)
Induction therapy, n (%)
  DA 10 (30.3) 20 (23.3)
  IA 15 (45.5) 46 (53.5) 0.648
  Other   8 (24.2) 20 (23.3)
Consolidation therapy, n (%)
  Regimen 1 17 (58.6) 31 (38.8)
  Regimen 2   8 (27.6) 34 (42.5) 0.179
  Regimen 3   4 (13.8) 15 (18.8)
IT, n (%)
  ≤2 11 (31.0) 37 (42.5) 0.415
  >2 25 (69.0) 50 (57.5)
Outcomes of therapy, %
  Rate of RFS 34.5 68.8 <0.001
  Rate of OS 48.3 73.8 0.003
a

c-kit mutation and FLT3-ITD mutation data were not collected for all patients. WBC, white blood cell; FLT3-ITD, mutation in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 gene; DA, cytarabine plus daunorubicin; IA, cytarabine plus idarubicin; IT, intrathecal injection; OS, overall survival; RFS, relapse-free survival; APP, amyloid precursor protein; EML, extramedullary leukemia.