Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 28;20(9):1338–1347. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1240

Table 4.

Multivariable logistic regression of predictors of specialist palliative care needs

Variable OR (95% CI) P‐value
MAGGIC risk score, per 5 unit increase 1.03 (0.76–1.40) 0.861
AKPS score, per 10 unit increase 0.98 (0.95–1.01) 0.161
NAT‐PD‐HF significant needs 1.03 (0.44–2.42) 0.947
KCCQ summary score, per unit increase 0.97 (0.94–0.99) 0.021
HADS Depression summary score, per unit increase 1.03 (0.92–1.15) 0.610
HADS Anxiety summary score, per unit increase 1.03 (0.94–1.13) 0.526
ESAS summary score, per unit increase 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.952
SF‐12 Physical summary score, per unit increase 0.97 (0.92–1.03) 0.311
SF‐12 Mental summary score, per unit increase 0.97 (0.92–1.02) 0.222

AKPS, Australia modified Karnofsky Performance Status; CI, confidence interval; ESAS, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; KCCQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; MAGGIC, Meta‐Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure; NAT‐PD‐HF, Needs Assessment Tool‐Progressive Disease‐Heart Failure; OR, odds ratio; SF‐12, Short Form 12.