Skip to main content
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
letter
. 2019 Jul 2;23:240. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2526-2

Adsorption and caspofungin dosing during continuous renal replacement therapy

Patrick M Honore 1,, David De Bels 1, Rachid Attou 1, Sebastien Redant 1, Andrea Gallerani 1, Kianoush Kashani 2
PMCID: PMC6607527  PMID: 31266525

In a recent letter by Aguilar et al., the pharmacokinetics of caspofungin during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and the potential impact of adsorptive membrane capacity on its removal were described [1]. In this study, administered loading caspofungin dose was 50 or 70 mg based on patient weight. As the investigators demonstrated and considering that echinocandins are highly protein-bound and non-renally eliminated, caspofungin removal with CRRT was negligible [1]. Polysulphone membranes that were used by the investigators have minimal adsorptive capacity [2]. However, highly adsorptive membranes (HAMs; e.g., AN69 surface-treated and polymethylmethacrylate filters) could potentially adsorb echinocandins effectively. HAMs’ slow saturation rate would likely increase echinocandins elimination to a clinically relevant level. This, in turn, could lower maximal concentration (Cmax). By reducing Cmax/minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio for this class of antifungals, their effectiveness could be compromised [3]. This may lead to the need for dose adjustment while on CRRT [4]. In a recent study, Roger et al. showed a higher loading dose (100 mg) is necessary for critically ill patients on CRRT, which is higher than the dosing scheme used by Aguilar et al. [5]. It is essential to highlight that despite the fact that Aguilar and colleagues found minimal caspofungin elimination by CRRT, a third of their patients had subtherapeutic blood levels. Therefore, the standard dosing scheme (50 or 70 mg based on patient weight) when HAMs are used may result in significantly low caspofungin blood levels. We believe, further studies should be conducted focusing on caspofungin dosing on CRRT with HAM filters in order to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of caspofungin and determine its correct dosing strategy.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

Cmax

maximal concentration

CRRT

continuous renal replacement therapy

HAMs

highly adsorptive membranes

MIC

minimal inhibitory concentration

Authors’ contributions

PMH and KK designed the paper. All authors participated in drafting the manuscript, and have read and approved the final version.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors declare that they have received no external funding.

Availability of data and materials

Not appropriate.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

This comment refers to the article available at 10.1186/s13054-016-1594-9.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Patrick M. Honore, Phone: 0032/2/4773946, Email: Patrick.Honore@CHU-Brugmann.be

David De Bels, Email: David.DeBels@CHU-Brugmann.be.

Rachid Attou, Email: Rachid.Attou@CHU-Brugmann.be.

Sebastien Redant, Email: Sebastien.Redant@CHU-Brugmann.be.

Andrea Gallerani, Email: Andrea.Gallerani@CHU-Brugmann.be.

Kianoush Kashani, Email: Kashani.Kianoush@Mayo.Edu.

References

  • 1.Aguilar G, Ferriols R, Lozano A, Ezquer C, Carbonell JA, Jurado A, et al. Optimal doses of caspofungin during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2017;21:17. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1594-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Honore PM, Jacobs R, Joannes-Boyau O, De Regt J, De Waele E, et al. Newly designed CRRT membranes for sepsis and SIRS--a pragmatic approach for bedside intensivists summarizing the more recent advances: a systematic structured review. ASAIO J. 2013;59:99–106. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182816a75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.González de Molina F, Martínez-Alberici Mde L, Ferrer R. Treatment with echinocandins during continuous renal replacement therapy. Crit Care. 2014;18(2):218. doi: 10.1186/cc13803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tomasa TM. Echinocandins and continuous renal replacement therapies: the role of adsorption. J Nephrol Kidney Dis. 2018;2(1):118. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roger Claire, Wallis Steven C., Muller Laurent, Saissi Gilbert, Lipman Jeffrey, Brüggemann Roger J., Lefrant Jean-Yves, Roberts Jason A. Caspofungin Population Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration or Haemodiafiltration. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2016;56(9):1057–1068. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0495-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not appropriate.


Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES