Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 19;2019:6740616. doi: 10.1155/2019/6740616

Table 2.

Effect of chronic elafibranor (elaf) treatment on the inflammatory profiles of HFD mice with steatohepatitis and CKD.

NC-24w HFD-24w HFD-elaf
Kidney weight (mg) 356 ± 10 423 ± 9 318 ± 34
[triglyceride, TG, mg/dL] 57 ± 3.9 299 ± 28 211 ± 14#
Hepatic TG levels (mg/g) 98 ± 7 240 ± 18 200 ± 10#
[fasting glucose] (mg/dL) 116 ± 13 243 ± 28 203 ± 9#
[fasting Insulin] (ng/mL) 1.9 ± 0.2 6.9 ± 0.85 5.2 ± 0.8
Homeostasis model assessment-insulin-resistance (HOMA-IR) index 3.8 ± 0.4 28.8 ± 6.4 18.1 ± 1.1#
[Aspartate aminotransferase] (AST, U/L) 40.9 ± 1.6 117.3 ± 20.1 79.5 ± 4.3#
[Alanine aminotransferase] (ALT, U/L) 46.8 ± 10.3 183.2 ± 6.8 104.2 ± 13.7#
[IL-6, pg/mL] 144 ± 18 223 ± 35 168 ± 9#
Kidney IL-6 (pg/mg protein) 1.8 ± 0.4 7 ± 0.8 6.2 ± 1.9
[TNFα, pg/mL] 12 ± 5 40 ± 11 29 ± 8##
Renal TNFα (pg/mg protein) 4 ± 0.8 16 ± 2.3 9 ± 1.1#
Renal MPO activity (U/g) 8.6 ± 1.5 51 ± 20 31 ± 4#
Renal caspase-3 activity (pmol/µg protein) 35 ± 1 90 ± 5 72 ± 3#

NC-24w/HFD-24w: mice receiving 24-week high-fat diet (HFD) or normal chow (NC) feeding and vehicle treatment; NC-elaf/HFD-elaf: HFD- or NC-fed mice receiving 12-week elafibranor treatment from 13th to 24th week of either HFD or NC feeding; HOMA-IR: calculated as ([fasting glucose]×[fasting insulin])/58.32. , ∗∗p<0.05,0.01 vs. NC-group; #,##p<0.05, 0.01 vs. HFD-group.