Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 16;34(29):9522–9536. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0111-14.2014

Table 2.

Rhythmicity data of ITP-overexpressing flies and controls in DD

Genotype Period in hours (SEM) (n rhythmic flies) Power (SEM) Rhythmic flies
UAS-ITP2/+ (ITP2) 23.4 (0.07) (30) 29.6 (1.2) 100%
tim(UAS)G4/+ 24.1 (0.04) (30) 39.9 (2.30) 97%
tim(UAS)G4>ITP2 25.0 (0.25) (2) 19.8 (2.16) 7%**
timG4/+ 24.6 (0.11) (23) 22.2 (1.18) 74%
timG4>ITP2 – (–) (0) – (–) 0%**
pdfG4/+ 24.4 (0.06) (30) 31.7 (1.59) 97%
pdfG4>ITP2 23.7 (0.10) (31) 21.4 (0.70) 97%
perG4 25.3 (0.16) (31) 32.1 (2.03) 97%
perG4>ITP2 23.7 (0.04) (29) 29.1 (1.66) 100%
clk856G4/+ 23.8 (0.04) (32) 41.0 (1.89) 100%
clk856G4>ITP2 23.3 (0.04) (32) 35.2 (1.82) 100%
cryG439/+ 25.2 (0.16) (24) 22.9 (1.60) 75%
cryG439>ITP2 23.9 (0.06) (26) 21.5 (1.21) 81%
elavG4/+ 23.7 (0.06) (25) 23.8 (1.73) 83%
elavG4>ITP2 23.6 (0.06) (20) 28.7 (2.53) 100%
386y(amon)G4/+ 23.1 (0.77) (31) 29.1 (2.04) 97%
386y(amon)G4>ITP2 23.5 (0.05) (27) 26.7 (1.19) 100%

Percentage of rhythmicity and period lengths of ITP-overexpressing strains were always compared with the respective GAL4-control and UAS-ITP2-control.

**Highly significant differences (for statistical values, see main text).