Table 2.
Genotype | Period in hours (SEM) (n rhythmic flies) | Power (SEM) | Rhythmic flies |
---|---|---|---|
UAS-ITP2/+ (ITP2) | 23.4 (0.07) (30) | 29.6 (1.2) | 100% |
tim(UAS)G4/+ | 24.1 (0.04) (30) | 39.9 (2.30) | 97% |
tim(UAS)G4>ITP2 | 25.0 (0.25) (2) | 19.8 (2.16) | 7%** |
timG4/+ | 24.6 (0.11) (23) | 22.2 (1.18) | 74% |
timG4>ITP2 | – (–) (0) | – (–) | 0%** |
pdfG4/+ | 24.4 (0.06) (30) | 31.7 (1.59) | 97% |
pdfG4>ITP2 | 23.7 (0.10) (31) | 21.4 (0.70) | 97% |
perG4 | 25.3 (0.16) (31) | 32.1 (2.03) | 97% |
perG4>ITP2 | 23.7 (0.04) (29) | 29.1 (1.66) | 100% |
clk856G4/+ | 23.8 (0.04) (32) | 41.0 (1.89) | 100% |
clk856G4>ITP2 | 23.3 (0.04) (32) | 35.2 (1.82) | 100% |
cryG439/+ | 25.2 (0.16) (24) | 22.9 (1.60) | 75% |
cryG439>ITP2 | 23.9 (0.06) (26) | 21.5 (1.21) | 81% |
elavG4/+ | 23.7 (0.06) (25) | 23.8 (1.73) | 83% |
elavG4>ITP2 | 23.6 (0.06) (20) | 28.7 (2.53) | 100% |
386y(amon)G4/+ | 23.1 (0.77) (31) | 29.1 (2.04) | 97% |
386y(amon)G4>ITP2 | 23.5 (0.05) (27) | 26.7 (1.19) | 100% |
Percentage of rhythmicity and period lengths of ITP-overexpressing strains were always compared with the respective GAL4-control and UAS-ITP2-control.
**Highly significant differences (for statistical values, see main text).