Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2019 Jan 19;85:148–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.01.026

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Total (a) and moderate (c) damage area percent were greater in 2.5% strain for all cycle numbers when compared with the 1.0%, 500 cycle group and control. High damage area percent was greater in 2.5%, 300 and 500 cycle groups when compared with the lower cycle number (2.5%, 50 cycle) and lower strain (1.0%, 500 cycle and control) groups. Bar denotes p < 0.05.