Table 1.
A. Comparison of positive and negative infection detection by PCR and LAMP | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
N: 111 samples | PCR positive | PCR negative | LAMP positive | LAMP negative |
Qiagen | 86 (77.5%) | 25 | 104 (93.7%) | 7 |
LAMP-PURE | 86 (77.5%) | 25 | 97 (87.4%) | 14 |
B. Comparison of positive and negative infection detection by KK and PCR | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
N: 111 samples | PCR Qiagen positive | PCR Qiagen negative | PCR LAMP-PURE positive | PCR LAMP-PURE negative |
KK positive | 9 (8.1%) | 25 | 7 (6.3%) | 2 |
KK negative | 77 (69.3%) | 0 | 79 (71.8%) | 23 |
C. Comparison of positive and negative infection detection by KK and LAMP | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
N: 111 samples | LAMP Qiagen positive | LAMP Qiagen negative | LAMP LAMP-PURE positive | LAMP LAMP-PURE negative |
KK positive | 9 (8.1%) | 0 | 8 (7.2%) | 1 |
KK negative | 95 (85.6%) | 7 | 89 (80.1%) | 13 |
KK = Kato-Katz; LAMP-PURE = loop-mediated isothermal amplification-Procedure for Ultra Rapid Extraction; PCR = polymerase chain reaction.