Skip to main content
. 2019 May 13;101(1):101–107. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0097

Table 4.

Details and summary of the diagnostic performance of different studies using LAMP for CL diagnosis compared with our study

Kothalawala et al.50 Adams et al.51 Verma et al.49 Verma et al.52 This study: 3 different species-specific LAMP
Country Suriname Colombia India India Tunisia
LAMP target 18S rRNA 18S rRNA kDNA kDNA cpb
Primer specificity L. donovani Leishmania genus L. donovani, L. major, L. tropica L. donovani L. major, L. tropica, L. infantum
Study population 17 CL 105 CL 10 CL 62 PKDL 82 CL suspects
Clinical specimen tested Lesion aspirate Lesion swab Skin biopsy Skin biopsy Lesion aspirate
DNA purification method Boom method Qiagen DNAeasy blood and tissue kit QIAamp Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) QIAamp Mini Kit (QIAGEN) Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification kit (Promega)
Reference test Microscopy Microscopy and/or culture rK39 RDT-positive qPCR rK39 RDT-positive qPCR qPCR
Sensitivity (%) 82.6 95 80 97 84
Specificity (%) 100 86 100 100 100

CL = cutaneous leishmaniasis; cpb = cysteine protease B; L. = Leishmania; LAMP = loop-mediated isothermal amplification; qPCR = quantitative PCR.