Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 3;51:37. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0479-1

Table 5.

RHM analysis conditioned on adding the top SNPs from GWAS to the model sequentially

Scenario GRMi (SE) GRMc (SE) Logl LRT
No condition 0.030 (0.008) 0.16 (0.02) − 10644
Cond. on S1 0.028 (0.008) 0.16 (0.02) − 10643 2
Cond. on S1 + S2 0.026 (0.007) 0.16 (0.02) − 10642 4
Cond. on S1 + S2 + S3 0.026 (0.007) 0.16 (0.02) − 10644 0
Cond. on S1 + S2 + S3 + S4 0.023 (0.007) 0.16 (0.02) − 10641 6
Cond. on S1 + S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 0.020 (0.006) 0.16 (0.02) − 10637 14
Cond. on S1 + S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 + S6 0.019 (0.006) 0.16 (0.02) − 10636 16

GRMi and GRMc as in Table 4

S1: rs421630816; S2: rs424521894; S3: rs425769499; S4: rs416517011; S5: rs404837788; S6: rs413573644

Logl: log likelihood

SE: standard error