Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 5.
Published in final edited form as: SLAS Discov. 2017 Sep 25;23(2):183–192. doi: 10.1177/2472555217732072

Table 1.

Screening Outcomes across Representative Targets.

Target Protein Protein Class Protein Mass (kDa) Engineered/Native Hit Rate (>3σ), %
ATG4B Protease 44.5 Native 0.1
Nativea 1.4
Engineered 1.5
Lfa1 Integrin, I-domain 21.0 Engineeredb 1.8
Engineeredb 1.6
Mac1 Integrin, I-domain 22.8 Engineeredb 2.6
Engineeredb 2.3
LRH-1c,d Nuclear receptor 28.3 Native 0.7
Target 1 Ubiquitin ligase 8.78 Native 1.4
Target 2 Kinase 19.3 Native 0.4
Target 3c Kinase 37.3 Engineered 0.6
14–3-3σ Adapter protein 26.5 Native 1.8
Engineeredb 2.8
Engineeredb 2.7
a

Screened in the presence of a protein partner.

b

Cys-mutants targeting the same pocket on a respective target.

c

Screened 1280 of 1600 compounds.

d

de Jesus Cortez et al.25