Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 4;176(9):744–753. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18030357

Table 3.

MIMIC model results

Effects of Predictors on Latent Factors

Negative Emotionality
Executive Function
Incentive Salience
Predictor Estimate S.E. p-value Estimate S.E. p-value Estimate S.E. p-value
AUD Diagnosisa 0.641 0.105 <0.0001 0.923 0.083 <0.0001 1.507 0.073 <0.0001
Genderb 0.329 0.104 0.001 0.093 0.089 0.295 −0.069 0.079 0.381
Racec −0.056 0.097 0.564 0.377 0.085 <0.0001 0.332 0.074 <0.0001
Age −0.027 0.048 0.574 −0.055 0.045 0.22 0.002 0.042 0.966
Emotional Abuse 0.202 0.068 0.003 0.133 0.06 0.025 0.187 0.054 0.001
Physical Abuse 0.07 0.065 0.281 0.006 0.058 0.925 −0.067 0.054 0.219
Sexual Abuse 0.107 0.047 0.023 0.116 0.045 0.01 0.007 0.044 0.881
Emotional Neglect 0.19 0.072 0.008 0.014 0.063 0.821 −0.031 0.053 0.56
Physical Neglect −0.072 0.068 0.293 0.066 0.062 0.28 0.067 0.048 0.159
Family History 0.043 0.049 0.382 0.088 0.044 0.044 0.07 0.035 0.049
Age at First Drink −0.075 0.053 0.161 −0.109 0.044 0.014 −0.055 0.035 0.114
Significant Direct Effects of Predictors on Indicators
Extraversion Neuroticism Agreeableness

Predictor Estimate S.E. p-value Estimate S.E. p-value Estimate S.E. p-value

AUD a 0.447 0.134 0.001 -- -- -- -- -- --
Genderb -- -- -- −0.401 0.092 <0.0001 −0.337 0.105 0.001
Age -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.212 0.054 <0.0001

Note: Estimates are standardized coefficients. Estimates, S.E., and p-values are bolded for significant predictors of each latent factor.

a

Current AUD: 0 = no, 1 = yes

b

Gender: 0 = male, 1 = female

c

Race: 0 = white/Caucasian, 1 = black/other