. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Jan 4;4(12):1080–1089. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.12.005

Table 4:

Sparse matrix structure - modulation effect

Location	Deprivation		Correlated with BMI	Correlated with NDSR-High Calorie Foods
Location	Strength (Hz)	Posterior probability	Correlated with BMI	Correlated with NDSR-High Calorie Foods
L Insula → L DLPFC	−0.5647	0.9999	r = −0.468, p = 0.001	r = −0.711, p < 0.001
R Insula → R DLPFC	−0.5273	0.9999	r = −0.678, p < 0.001	r = −0.672, p < 0.001
L Insula → L Striatum	0.7132	0.9999	r = 0.682, p < 0.001	r = 0.543, p < 0.001
R Insula → R Striatum	0.6950	0.9999	r = 0.526, p < 0.001	r = 0.669, p < 0.001
R Insula → ACC	−0.3165	0.9999	r = −0.317, p = 0.034^a	r = −0.308, p = 0.040^a

Among the 56 connections, only those that were identified (posterior probability > 0.999) to be modulated by one of the three conditions are listed. Posterior mean strength (Hz) and posterior probability of each identified (posterior probability > 0.999) modulation effect are demonstrated.

^a:

not significant anymore after Bonferroni multiple comparison correction.