Table 2.
Effect of distance to the nearest facility on block screening participation rate
| Homogeneous effect | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRR | (95% CI) | P-value | IRR | 95% CI | P-value | |||||
| Distance to the nearest: | ||||||||||
| Subsidized private clinic (in 100 m) | 0.91 | (0.82 | – | 1.01) | 0.071 | 1.02 | (0.94 | – | 1.10) | 0.652 |
| Park (in km) | 0.92 | (0.61 | – | 1.40) | 0.705 | 1.05 | (0.79 | – | 1.39) | 0.762 |
| Healthy eatery (in 100 m) | 1.03 | (0.95 | – | 1.13) | 0.439 | 1.03 | (0.96 | – | 1.10) | 0.415 |
| Polyclinic (in km) | 0.94 | (0.89 | – | 0.98) | 0.007 | 0.97 | (0.94 | – | 1.00) | 0.088 |
IRR = Incidence Rate Ratio.
Model 1: Unadjusted analysis for each facility.
Model 2: Adjusted for age, gender, and ethnicity, with homogeneous effect across regions for each facility.
Model 3: Adjusted for age, gender, and ethnicity with heterogeneous effect across regions for each facility.
Model 4: Adjusted for age, ethnicity, gender, and distance to the nearest polyclinic with heterogeneous effect across regions for private clinic and park.