Table 3.
Challenges impeding progress toward the development of effective T-cell biomarkers in T1D
| Challenges | Potential solutions and technological advances needed |
|---|---|
| Biological | |
| High repertoire diversity and low precursor frequency of autoreactive T cells in peripheral blood | Develop or improve assays capable of measuring the complex mixture of autoreactive T cells |
| Implement new technologies and approaches for identifying pathogenic signatures, including high-dimensional flow cytometry, mass cytometry, and barcoded antibodies or pMHC multimers for use in scRNA-Seq approaches | |
| Develop sensitive molecular biomarkers capable of detecting signatures of autoreactive T cells, including TCR immunosequencing | |
| Large numbers of genetic risk variants impacting cellular function | Create isogenic cellular systems to identify causative SNPs and elucidate their impact on T-cell function |
| Employ well-characterized biobanks with genotype-selectable donor samples | |
| High degree of heterogeneity in T-cell phenotypes among subjects with T1D | Conduct functional testing on subjects with defined phenotypic profiles |
| Define and control for covariates leading to heterogeneity in T-cell responses | |
| Design and conduct interventional trials using targeted populations with mechanistic outcomes | |
| Transient or variable autoreactivity over the natural history of the disease | Build robust longitudinal and interventional cohorts with sufficient clinical samples |
| Process | |
| Low sample volumes in peripheral blood of pediatric samples | Work toward miniaturizing functional assays |
| Develop surrogate markers of autoreactivity that do not require large sample volumes | |
| Need for measures that correlate T-cell autoreactivity with endogenous β-cell mass and/or function | Develop assays capable of detecting signals from autoreactive T cells in circulation reflective of ongoing pathology within T1D islets |
| Characterize the degree of overlap between tissues and peripheral blood signatures | |
| Need to understand the pathogenic potential of T-cell subsets or reactivities | Create biomimetic devices to model the islet:immune microenvironment |
| Employ new technologies to test the function of antigen-specific T cells in viable pancreatic tissue sections | |
| Need for assay reproducibility and interoperability | Employ independent validation cores and sample resources capable of repeating assays to test reproducibility and robustness |
| Incentivize replication testing | |
| Paradigms | |
| Focus on limited epitopes from known autoantigens | Consider nonnative peptides, hybrid peptides, posttranslationally modified peptides |
| Implement novel high-throughput unbiased peptide screens | |
| Implement novel computational approaches to model peptides capable of activating T cells through the TCR:MHC complex | |
| Consider alternate concepts to explain origins of autoreactivity | Improve understanding of endogenous stress response and host response to commensal bacteria and viral agents, for example |
| Focus on classical T1D pathogenesis | Broaden studies to include longitudinal studies of T cells in cancer subjects receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors |
| Understand autoreactivity emanating from rare genetic variants with high penetrance of T1D | |
| T-cell–centric approaches | Broaden studies to better understand T cell:B cell and T cell:APC interactions |
| Understand exogenous signals that can break T-cell tolerance | |
| Heavy focus on the pathogenic features of T-cell autoreactivity in subjects with known genetic risk | Better understand the principles related to the mechanisms by which the MHC class II haplotype of DR15-DQ6 influences the T-cell repertoire and leads to dominant protection from disease |
APC, antigen-presenting cell; pMHC, peptide MHC; scRNA-Seq, single-cell RNA sequencing; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.