Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 8;68(7):1528–1535. doi: 10.2337/db19-0045

Table 2.

Comparison of DS-PNDM with non-DS PNDM and autoimmune non-DS PNDM

Characteristic DS-PNDM (n = 13) Non-DS PNDM (n = 458) Autoimmune non-DS PNDM (n = 40)
Age at diabetes diagnosis (weeks) 2.3 (0.4, 7.5) 7 (3, 12) 4 (1, 13.5)
Female sex 23% (3 of 13) 43% (197 of 458) 12.5% (5 of 40)*
Birth weight z score −1.23 (−2.65, −0.84) [n = 10] −1.74 (−2.55, −0.82) [n = 378] −0.39 (−1.06, 0.29) [n = 30]
Positive for ≥1 autoantibodies§ 4 of 9 (44%) 21 of 293 (7%)|| 13 of 28 (46%)
T1D-GRS 0.61 (0.49, 0.66) 0.55 (0.51, 0.61) 0.57 (0.52, 0.62)

T1D-GRS: centiles based on control subjects with T1D. Age at diabetes diagnosis, birth weight z score, and T1D-GRS are given as median (interquartile range). Other than where indicated, data were similar for all cohorts (P > 0.1).

*Low due to males with IPEX (immunodysregulation polyendocrinopathy enteropathy X-linked) syndrome (n = 25/40).

†Adjusted for sex and gestational age.

‡DS-PNDM vs. autoimmune non-DS PNDM, P = 0.02.

§One or more positive titer for GADA, IA-2A, or ZnT8A.

||DS-PNDM vs. non-DS PNDM, P = 0.006.