Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 1;9(6):1254–1265.

Table 7.

Baseline characteristics of patients in CT with CIK, TACE with CIK and TACE groups

Characteristics TACE With CIK CT with CIK TACE without CIK P-value
Age (yrs) 54.38+11.40 54+12.13 57.92+12.12 0.142
Gender 0.663
    Male 48 (92.3%) 54 (93.1%) 57 (96.6%)
    Female 4 (7.7%) 4 (6.9%) 2 (3.4%)
Tumor size 75.83+35.95 72.21+34.72 75.26+28.67 0.894
Vascular invasion 0.124
    Positive 17 (32.7%) 19 (32.8%) 27 (45.8%)
    Negative 35 (67.3%) 39 (67.2%) 32 (54.2%)
AFP Levels 400.78+551.94 1248.35+4790.08 561.41+560.82 0.246
HBV infection 0.700
    Positive 47 (90.4%) 55 (94.8%) 56 (94.9%)
    Negative 4 (7.7%) 2 (5.2%) 3 (5.1%)
Liver cirrhosis 0.324
    Positive 44 (84.6%) 46 (79.3%) 43 (72.9%)
    Negative 8 (15.4%) 12 (20.7%) 16 (27.1%)
Tumor number 0.015
    > 1 19 (36.5%) 10 (17.2%) 24 (40.7%)
    1 33 (63.5%) 48 (82.8%) 35 (59.3%)
Tumor stage 0.763
    I+II 17 (32.7%) 19 (32.8%) 16 (27.1%)
    III+IV 35 (67.3%) 39 (67.2%) 43 (72.9%)
Child-Pugh Classification Grade 0.021*
    A 28 (53.8%) 35 (60.3%) 46 (78%)
    B and C 24 (46.2%) 23 (39.7%) 13 (22%)
ALT 46.88+ 30.53 60.24+43.41 49.98+28.29 0.255
ALB 37.21+4.64 38.24+4.08 38.49+5.36 0.336
TBIL 25.10+18.88 20.97+17.96 18.4+9.69     0.090**
PT 14.85+2.47 14.04+2.01 13.94+1.24     0.033***
*

(TACE with CIK VS. TACE without CIK, P = 0.008; CT with CIK VS. TACE without CIK P = 0.045);

**

(TACE without CIK VS. CT with CIK, P = 0.029);

***

(TACE with CIK VS. TACE without CIK, P = 0.004; TACE with CIK VS. CT with CIK, P = 0.034).