Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 26;32:145. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.145.10695

Table 3.

practice levels of respondents (n =200) in relation to Taenia solium transmission and their socio-demographic characteristics as well as behavioural practices

Variables Good N (%) Poor N (%) Total N (%) Bivariate p-value Logistic regression OR; 95% CI; p-value
Age groups (in years)
< 20 4 (66.7) 2 (33.3) 6 (3.0) REFERENCE
20 – 30 14 (37.8) 23 (62.2) 37 (18.5) 0.005 0.30; 0.05-1.88; 0.201
31 – 40 6 (13.6) 38 (86.4) 44 (22.0) 0.08; 0.01-0.53; 0.009
≥41 24 (21.2) 89 (78.8) 113 (56.5) 0.13; 0.02-0.78; 0.025
Sex
Male 17 (10.8) 140 (89.1) 157 (78.5) 0.000 REFERENCE
Female 31 (72.1) 12 (27.9) 43 (21.5) 21.27; 9.23-49.04; 0.000
Education status
No formal education 17 (20.5) 66 (79.5) 83 (41.5)
Primary 21 (28.0) 54 (72.0) 75 (37.5) 0.543 NA*
Post-primary 10 (23.8) 32 (76.2) 42 (21.0)
Duration as pig workers/consumers (in years)
≤3 16 (47.1) 18 (52.9) 34 (17.0) 0.001 REFERENCE
> 3 32 (19.3) 134 (80.7) 166 (83.0) 0.27; 0.12-0.58; 0.001
Pork consumption
Yes 42 (24.1) 132 (75.9) 174 (87.0) 0.906 NA*
No 6 (23.1) 20 (76.9) 26 (13.0)
Purchased pork from(**N=174)
Abattoir 27 (57.4) 20 (42.6) 47 (27.0) REFERENCE
Home slaughter 15 (11.8) 112 (87.2) 127 (73.0) 0.000 0.10; 0.05-0.22; 0.000
Toilet use at home
Toilet facility 41 (33.9) 80 (66.1) 121 (60.5) 0.000 REFERENCE
Open field/farmlands 7 (8.9) 72 (91.1) 79 (39.5) 0.19; 0.08-0.45
Total 48 (24.0) 152 (76.0) 200 (100.0)
*

NA: not applicable as p-value at bivariate analysis is more than 10%

**

The respondents (n=26) who were not pork consumers were excluded from the analysis