Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 27;4(2):188–194. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2017.1377386

Table 3.

Comparison of the method with other studies.

Method Analyte Linear range Concentration (μg/mL) Recovery (%) LOD Reference
LLE–GC/MS MA, PD, TD, etc. 10–5000 ng/mL 2.5 63.3–81.1 2 ng/mL [18]
SPE–GC/MS MA, PD, TD, etc. 10–5000 ng/mL 2.5 66.8–98.5 2 ng/mL [18]
SPE–GC/MS MA, KT, etc. 5–200 ng/mL 0.1 95.4–96.8 2.5 ng/mL [19]
SPE–GC/MS MA, KT, TD, etc. 0.2–50 μg/mL 10 30–82 0.06–2 μg/mL [20]
LLE–GC/MS MA, PD, TD, KT 0.5 63–104 25–50 ng/mL [21]
SPE–GC/MS PD 1.25–40 ng/mL 0.02 109 ± 10.9 0.5 ng/mL [22]
DLLME–GC/MS MA, PD, TD, KT 10–1000 ng/mL 0.1 80.45–95.55 0.43–1.96 ng/mL Present work