Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 28;10:1447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01447

TABLE 3.

Multiple regression analysis with moderating effects of maternal support, paternal support, and gender on the relationship between affective empathy (linear and quadratic) and depression.

B SE B β p
Intercept 7.760 0.358
Gender –0.876 0.519 –0.107 0.092
Linear AE 0.130 0.097 0.118 0.180
Quadratic AE 0.003 0.019 0.013 0.865
M_SUP -0.431 0.115 -0.351 0.0001
P_SUP -0.259 0.095 -0.240 0.007
Linear AE X gender –0.037 0.129 –0.023 0.776
Quadratic AE X gender –0.031 0.028 –0.097 0.270
M_SUP X gender 0.610 0.177 0.363 0.001
P_SUP X gender –0.265 0.159 –0.165 0.096
Linear AE X M_SUP –0.030 0.034 –0.100 0.372
Linear AE X P_SUP –0.007 0.028 –0.027 0.792
Quadratic AE X M_SUP 0.011 0.006 0.230 0.066
Quadratic AE X P_SUP 0.003 0.005 0.064 0.549
Linear AE X M_SUP X gender 0.076 0.047 0.193 0.105
Linear AE X P_SUP X gender –0.016 0.038 –0.039 0.678
Quadratic AE X M_SUP X gender -0.020 0.009 -0.333 0.020
Quadratic AE X P_SUP X gender 0.009 0.008 0.136 0.235

AE, Affective Empathy; M_SUP, Maternal Support; P_SUP, Paternal Support.Full model R2 = 0.20; F(17, 368) = 5.55, p < 0.001; Model with only the linear term of gender, affective empathy, maternal and paternal support variables) R2 = 0.16; F(4, 381) = 18.705, p < 0.001; statistically significant betas (p < 0.05).