Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 28;10:1447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01447

TABLE 4.

Multiple regression analysis with moderating effects of maternal support, paternal support, and gender on the relationship between cognitive empathy (linear and quadratic) and depression.

B SE B β P
Intercept 7.926 0.358
Gender -1.304 0.497 -0.159 0.009
Linear CE 0.198 0.083 0.178 0.018
Quadratic CE 0.001 0.018 0.003 0.966
M_SUP -0.470 0.118 -0.382 0.0001
P_SUP -0.224 0.092 -0.207 0.015
Linear CE X gender –0.126 0.114 –0.084 0.269
Quadratic CE X gender –0.004 0.025 –0.014 0.870
M_SUP X gender 0.477 0.167 0.284 0.004
P_SUP X gender –0.109 0.145 –0.068 0.452
Linear CE X M_SUP 0.002 0.025 0.007 0.934
Linear CE X P_SUP -0.054 0.025 -0.174 0.034
Quadratic CE X M_SUP 0.011 0.005 0.234 0.042
Quadratic CE X P_SUP –0.004 0.005 –0.083 0.362
Linear CE X M_SUP X gender 0.028 0.040 0.068 0.488
Linear CE X P_SUP X gender –0.014 0.039 –0.032 0.713
Quadratic CE X M_SUP X gender –0.012 0.007 –0.215 0.085
Quadratic CE X P_SUP X gender 0.005 0.007 0.064 0.490

CE, Cognitive Empathy; M_SUP, Maternal Support; P_SUP, Paternal Support.Full model: R2 = 0.21; F(17, 368) = 5.89, p < 0.001; Model with only the linear term of gender, cognitive empathy, maternal and paternal support variables) R2 = 0.16; F(4, 381) = 18.210, p < 0.001; statistically significant betas (p < 0.05).