Lifestyle improvement is effective for glycemic control in people with diabetes.1 Several studies have shown that the use of the internet of things (IoT), the network of various things that enables the connection of data over the internet, facilitates an improvement in the glycemic control. These include automated messages promoting lifestyle changes,2 automated feedback messages conveying health parameters,3,4 and a smartphone-based self-management support system that can interact with patients’ inputs in real time.5 However, it should be noted that the control group was not provided with measurement devices in any of these previous studies, and therefore it is possible that the achieved improvement in glycemic control was due to measurement of health parameters per se but not to the IoT system.
We have developed an IoT automated system that demonstrates a summary of lifelogging data (body weight, blood pressure, and daily activities) from each measurement device on one screen (Figure 1a). As shown in Figure 1b, the system also sends messages with characters of “Shichifukujin,” the seven deities of good luck who are believed to grant good luck in Japanese mythology, via a smartphone application encouraging patients to increase their physical activity and monitor body weight and blood pressure. In this prospective multicenter randomized controlled study, we examined whether the IoT system benefits glycemic control in people with diabetes of two independent models, the health guidance model and hospitalization model. We provided the control group with the same devices not equipped with the IoT system.
In the health guidance model, both the IoT and control groups (n = 50, respectively) showed a significant HbA1c reduction at 3 months as compared with the baseline (from 7.0 to 6.7% in the IoT group [P < .005] and from 7.1 to 6.8% in the control group [P < .005]), while only the IoT group maintained a significant reduction at 6 months (P < .05) along with BMI decreases. It was suggested that our IoT system was effective for the maintenance of lifestyle modification after the initial education at the health guidance.
In the hospitalization model, both the IoT (n = 42) and the control groups (n = 39) showed significant HbA1c reductions at 3 and 6 months as compared with the baseline, while there were no differences in the values between groups. Previous studies have shown that the effects of intensive lifestyle intervention during hospitalization lasted for 12 months after discharge.6 Thus, the 6-month period after discharge might not be sufficiently long to observe the effects of the IoT system in this model.
Our IoT system has several advantages over conventional devices. First, it could collect large amounts of lifelogging data and provide summaries to patients as well as physicians. Second, effective messages that help maintain lifestyle modification could be analyzed based on the integrated data, which is useful for establishing more effective systems. On the other hand, the limitations of the study are relatively small sample size and short observation period.
In conclusion, the newly developed IoT system was beneficial in maintaining glycemic control in people with diabetes.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Kunikazu Kondo, Masayuki Hayashi, Tetsuji Okawa, Koichi Adachi, Yoshio Nomura, Yoh Ariyoshi, Nobuaki Ozaki, Akemi Inagaki, Etsuko Yamamori, Hiromitsu Sasaki, Hideki Okamoto, Yoko Eguchi, Masanori Yoshida, Hiroshi Shimizu, Minemori Watanabe, Shuko Yoshioka, Ikuo Yamamori, Junji Shinoda, Yuka Muraoka, Shoko Nakajima.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: app, application; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; BW, body weight; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; IoT, internet of things.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan.
References
- 1. Avery L, Flynn D, van Wersch A, Sniehotta FF, Trenell MI. Changing physical activity behavior in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of behavioral interventions. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:2681-2689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Arambepola C, Ricci-Cabello I, Manikavasagam P, Roberts N, French DP, Farmer A. The impact of automated brief messages promoting lifestyle changes delivered via mobile devices to people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Orsama AL, Lahteenmaki J, Harno K, et al. Active assistance technology reduces glycosylated hemoglobin and weight in individuals with type 2 diabetes: results of a theory-based randomized trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15:662-669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cho JH, Kim HS, Yoo SH, et al. An Internet-based health gateway device for interactive communication and automatic data uploading: clinical efficacy for type 2 diabetes in a multi-centre trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23:595-604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Waki K, Fujita H, Uchimura Y, et al. DialBetics: a novel smartphone-based self-management support system for type 2 diabetes patients. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8:209-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wexler DJ, Beauharnais CC, Regan S, Nathan DM, Cagliero E, Larkin ME. Impact of inpatient diabetes management, education, and improved discharge transition on glycemic control 12 months after discharge. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;98:249-256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]