Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Genet. 2019 Jun 17;51(7):1131–1136. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0436-5

Table 1.

The association of three non-synonymous SNPs in BALF2 gene and the risk for NPC

SNP High-risk genotype Discovery
Validation
Combined
Odds ratio 95% CI P value conditional on SNPs
Annotation
156 cases 47 controls P value 483 cases 605 controls P value 639 cases 652 controls P value 163364 162476
162215C>A C 96.15% 65.96% 3.22×10−04 95.03% 74.71% 9.92×10−16 95.31% 74.08% 1.42×10−18 7.60 4.97–11.62 7.78×10−05 1.94×10−01 BALF2, V700L
162476T>C C 93.59% 61.70% 5.09×10−03 94.00% 65.12% 1.94×10−23 93.90% 64.88% 9.69×10−25 8.69 5.79–13.03 1.10×10−06 BALF2, I613V
163364C>T T 88.46% 48.94% 7.95×10−03 83.85% 45.45% 6.92×10−32 84.98% 45.71% 2.40×10−32 6.14 4.59–8.22 4.84×10−11 BALF2, V317M

The association of three EBV SNPs with NPC risk was tested in discovery and validation samples and with a meta-analysis of the combined discovery and validation samples. Frequencies of high-risk genotypes in discovery, validation and combined analyses are indicated. Odds ratios conferred by high-risk genotypes and the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from the meta-analysis of the combined discovery and validation phases. Conditional regression analyses were performed in combined samples, and P values of SNP associations in conditional analyses are listed.