Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Biomed Eng. 2019 Apr 8;47(7):1611–1625. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02261-w

Table 3:

Pearson’s correlation coefficients and p-values for the relationships of PWS, 99thWS, SAWS with the corresponding significantly correlated geometric indices for the uniform wall thickness AAA models. The superscripts a, b, e and f indicate geometric indices that were excluded following the analysis illustrated in Figure 5 in accordance to index pairs that were highly correlated.

Geometric index PWS 99thWS SAWS
Correlation coefficient p-value Correlation coefficient p-value Correlation coefficient p-value
Dneck,p 0.477 << 0.00156 0.545 << 0.00156 0.617 << 0.00156
Dneck,d 0.375 0.000119 0.405 << 0.00156 0.416 0.0000167
Cave 0.331 0.000763
Cmax 0.347 0.000398
S 0.620a << 0.00156 0.765a << 0.00156 0.830a << 0.00156
V 0.628 << 0.00156 0.769 << 0.00156 0.874 << 0.00156
IPR 0.457 << 0.00156 −0.610 << 0.00156 −0.727 << 0.00156
MAA −0.647 << 0.00156 −0.825 << 0.00156 −0.885 << 0.00156
GLN 0.384 << 0.00156
MLN 0.339 0.000559
Dmax 0.672b << 0.00156 0.830 b << 0.00156 0.910b << 0.00156
dc 0.365 c << 0.00156 0.458e << 0.00156
Dave 0.730 << 0.00156 0.872 << 0.00156 0.960 << 0.00156
Dmin 0.633 << 0.00156 0.602 << 0.00156 0.665 << 0.00156
Dc,max 0.479 << 0.00156 0.531 << 0.00156
βmin −0.346f 0.000415
DHr 0.582 << 0.00156 0.656 << 0.00156 0.719 << 0.00156