Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul;67(7):1101–1104. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1494_18

Table 5.

Comparison of groups with primary IOL explant and deferred IOL explant

Primary IOL explant Delayed IOL explant P value for difference 95% CI for difference
Number of eyes 25 52 0.32
Males 14 (56.36%) 23 (44.23%) 0.07
Mean age 54.09±14.9 58±15.02 0.16
Following trauma 2 (9.09%) 3 (5.76%) 0.59
Following cataract surgery 17 (68%) 44 (84.61%) 0.09
Following endogenous spread 2 (50%) 2 (50%) 1
Following noncataract surgery 2 (28.57%) 71.42%) 0.12
Vision at presentation (>20/400) 2 (7.27%) 14 (27%) 0.04 0.14% to 34.1%
Time to IOL explant in days from presentation 0 88.11±66.58 Median 70 <0.0001 61.49 to 114.72
Significant corneal haze at presentation 12 (47.27%) 21 (40.38%) 0.33
Interval between inciting event and endophthalmitis (days) 268.07±759.02 (Median 78) 198.44±603.84 (Median 80) 0.99
Interval between onset of symptoms to presentation (days) 6±2.75 (Median 8) 6.84±2.31 (Median 8) 0.09
Number of repeat intravitreal antibiotic injections required 0.58±0.86 (Median 0) 2.62±1.78 (Median 2) <0.0001 2.00 to 2.22
Days to resolution after IOL explant 35.16±14.26 (Median 32) 55.5±8.24 (Median 56.5) <0.0001 15.22 to 25.45
Total follow-up (months) 28.31±46.97 (Median 5.5) 21.03±37.27 (Median 7) 0.8
Retinal detachment in follow-up 0 (0%) 3 (5.76%) 0.07
Corneal decompensation in follow-up 6 (24%) 8 (15.38%) 0.28
Phthisis bulbi 2 (8%) 2 (3.84%) 0.44
Neovascular glaucoma 1 (4%) 0 0.14
Culture positive cases 9 (36%) 28 (53.84%) 0.14
Favorable vision at last follow-up 8 (32%) 20 (38.46%) 0.58