Skip to main content
. 2019 May 20;3(3):528–541. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12204

Table 1.

Summary of studies of hemophilia patients switching between factor VIII concentrates

Author Products Dose (IU/kg) No. of subjects screened for PK Age range
(mean)
[median]
Minimum washout period (d) Primary objective
Biosimilarity or comparative PK studies
Di Paola17 (1) Advate
(2) ReFacto
50 ± 5 21 19‐72
(35.8)
[30]
3 Compare PK of ReFacto and Advate to establish bioequivalence
Dmoszynska31 (1) Prior FVIII product
(2) Optivate
50 15 12‐65 3 Investigate the PK of Optivate against other FVIII products
Fijnvandraat32 (1) rFVIII SQ
(2) Octonativ M
50 12 17‐64
(34)
4 Compare PK of rFVIII SQ and Octonativ M
Kessler18 (1) ReFacto (2 formulations)
(2) Hemofil M
50 19 18‐44
(26.3)
5 Compare PK of the 2 formulations of ReFacto with Hemofil M to establish bioequivalence
Klamroth23 (1) Advate
(2) rFVIII single‐chain
50 27 19‐60
(35.4)
4 Compare PK parameters of rFVIII single‐chain with full‐length rFVIII
Martinowitz22 (1) Advate
(2) N8
50 25 13‐54
(24)
4 Compare PK profiles of N8 and Advate to establish bioequivalence
Morfini33 (1) pdFVIII
(2) rFVIII
25‐56
25‐45
17 15‐51
(27.7)
[24.9]
7 Compare PK profiles of 2 different classes of FVIII concentrates
Morfini34 (1) Recombinate
(2) Hemofil M
50 47 6‐62
(26.4)
7 Compare PK profiles of Recombinate and Hemofil M
Morfini35 (1) Hemofil M
(2) Monoclate HT
(3) Monoclate P
25 10 7 Compare in vivo behavior among the 3 products
Recht36 (1) Advate
(2) Xyntha
50 24 12‐60
[24]
3 Demonstrate PK equivalence of Advate
Shah19 (1) Advate
(2) Kovaltry
50 18 19‐64
(37.3)
[36]
3 Compare PK profile of Advate and Kovaltry
Shirahata37 (1) BAY14‐2222
(2) Kogenate
50 5 15‐43
(32)
[35]
5 Compare PK profile of BAY14‐2222 and Kogenate
Biosimilarity or comparative PK and inhibitor development studies
Abshire38 (1) Kogenate
(2) rFVIII‐FS
50 35 4 Compare PK and safety of Kogenate and rFVIII‐FS
Coyle39 (1) rFVIII‐FS
(2) BAY 94‐9027
25/50
25/60
14 21‐58
(36.1)
3 Assess PK and safety of BAY 94‐9027
Kulkarni40 (1) Prior FVIII product
(2) Turoctocog alfa

25‐60
69 1‐11
(6.1)
3 Investigate safety, efficacy, and PK properties of turoctocog alfa
Mahlangu29 (1) Advate
(2) rFVIIIFc
50 30 12‐65
[29]
Evaluate safety, efficacy, and PK of rFVIIIFc
Meunier41 (1) Prior FVIII product
(2) N8‐GP

60
24 0‐11
(6.0)
Assess safety, efficacy, and PK of N8‐GP
Mullins42 (1) Advate
(2) BAX855
60 ± 5 31 1‐11
(6)
[6]
Determine immunogenicity, PK, efficacy, safety, and quality of life using BAX855
Powell43 (1) Kogenate
(2) Kogenate with pegylated liposome carrier (13 or 22 mg/kg)
35 26 12‐60 2 Investigate the safety, tolerability, bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of Kogenate with pegylated liposome barrier compared with standard Kogenate
Schwartz44 (1) Koate‐HS
(2) Recombinant FVIII
50
20‐40
17 7 Compare PK of plasma‐derived and recombinant FVIII, assess efficacy of recombinant FVIII for home therapy, and assess efficacy for major surgical procedures and hemorrhage
Skotnicki45 (1) Vocento
(2) Biostate‐RP
50 17 18‐57
(36.5)
[37]
4 Evaluate efficacy, safety, and PK of Voncento
Tiede46 (1) Prior FVIII product
(2) N8‐GP

25/50/75
26 20‐60
[36.5]
4 Evaluate safety and PK of N8‐GP in comparison with previous FVIII products
Young30 (1) Prior FVIII product
(2) rFVIIIFc
50 60 1‐11
[5]
3 Evaluate safety, efficacy, and PK of rFVIIIFc
Inhibitor development studies
Hsu47 (1) Kogenate
(2) Koate‐HS
50
12 23‐53
(37.8)
7 Evaluate safety and efficacy of Kogenate
Powell48 (1) Advate
(2) rFVIIIFc
25/65
25/65
19 23‐61
(34.6)
3 Evaluate safety and treatment‐emergent adverse events, development of antibodies, and laboratory monitoring

‐, not specified; FVIII, factor VIII; pdFVIII, plasma‐derived factor VIII; PK, pharmacokinetics; rFVIII, recombinant factor VIII; SQ, subcutaneous.