Table 2.
Quality assessment with the PEDro scale.
Article | Items by number on the PEDro scale | Total score | Subjects | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |||
Lam et al. (50) | y | y | y | y | n | n | y | n | n | y | y | 6 | Older adults |
Wei et al. (69) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | y | y | y | y | 6 | |
Goudarzian et al. (45) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | y | n | y | y | 5 | |
Sitjà-Rabert et al. (64) | y | y | y | n | n | n | y | n | y | y | y | 6 | |
Santin-Medeiros et al. (62) | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y | 4 | |
Buckinx et al. (36) | y | y | n | n | n | n | y | n | y | y | y | 5 | |
Lee et al. (53) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | y | n | y | y | 5 | |
Beaudart et al. (31) | y | y | n | y | n | n | y | y | y | y | y | 7 | |
Gómez-Cabello et al. (44) | n | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y | y | 5 | |
Bogaerts, et al. (32) | y | y | y | y | n | n | n | y | n | y | y | 6 | |
Machado et al. (55) | y | y | n | n | n | n | y | y | n | y | y | 5 | |
Mikhael et al. (56) | y | y | y | y | y | n | y | n | n | y | y | 7 | |
Furness and Maschette (40) | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y | y | 5 | |
Rees et al. (59) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | y | n | y | y | 5 | |
Bautmans et al. (30) | y | y | y | y | y | n | y | y | n | y | y | 8 | |
Bruyere et al. (9) | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | y | y | 5 | |
Spielmanns et al. (71) | y | y | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | 5 | COPD |
Spielmanns et al. (65) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | y | n | y | y | 5 | |
Salhi et al. (61) | y | y | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | 6 | |
Pleguezuelos et al. (57) | y | y | n | y | n | n | y | n | n | y | y | 5 | |
Alp et al. (28) | y | y | y | n | n | n | y | y | n | y | y | 6 | Stroke |
Choi et al. (72) | y | y | y | y | n | n | y | y | y | y | y | 8 | |
Choi et al. (38) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | 4 | |
Liao et al. (54) | y | y | y | y | n | n | y | y | y | y | y | 8 | |
Lau et al. (51) | y | y | y | y | n | n | y | y | y | y | y | 8 | |
Brogårdh et al. (35) | y | y | y | y | y | n | y | y | y | y | y | 9 | |
van Nes Ilse et al. (67) | y | y | y | n | y | n | y | y | y | y | y | 8 | |
Bokaeian et al. (33) | y | y | y | y | n | n | n | y | n | y | y | 6 | Knee OA |
Wang et al. (68) | y | y | y | y | n | n | y | y | y | y | y | 8 | |
Simão et al. (63) | y | y | y | y | n | n | y | y | n | y | y | 7 | |
Avelar et al. (29) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | y | n | y | y | 5 | |
Sucuoglu al. (66) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | 4 | Postmenauposal women |
Iwamoto et al. (48) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | y | y | y | y | 6 | |
Raimundo et al. (58) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | 4 | |
Ebrahimi et al. (39) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | y | n | y | y | 5 | Multiple sclerosis |
Broekmans et al. (34) | y | y | y | y | n | n | y | y | n | y | y | 7 | |
In et al. (47) | y | y | y | y | y | n | y | y | n | y | y | 8 | Other pathologies in adults |
Gerhardt et al. (42) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | 4 | |
Gloeckl et al. (43) | y | y | y | y | n | n | y | n | n | y | y | 6 | |
Gaßner et al. (41) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | y | n | y | y | 5 | |
Johnson et al. (49) | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | 3 | |
Ahlborg et al. (27) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | y | y | y | y | 6 | |
Högler et al. (46) | y | y | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | 5 | Other pathologies in children |
Cheng et al. (37) | y | y | n | y | n | n | n | y | y | y | y | 6 | |
Lee et al. (53) | y | y | y | y | n | n | y | y | y | y | y | 8 | |
Ruck et al. (60) | y | y | y | y | n | n | n | n | n | y | y | 5 |
n, criterion not fulfilled; y, criterion fulfilled; 1, eligibility criteria were specified; 2, subjects were randomly allocated to groups or to a treatment order; 3, allocation was concealed; 4, the groups were similar at baseline; 5, there was blinding of all subjects; 6, there was blinding of all therapists; 7, there was blinding of all assessors; 8, measures of at least one key outcome were obtained from more than 85% of the subjects who were initially allocated to groups; 9, intention-to-treat analysis was performed on all subjects who received the treatment or control condition as allocated; 10, the results of between-group statistical comparisons are reported for at least one key outcome; 11, the study provides both point measures and measures of variability for at least one key outcome; total score, each satisfied item (except the first) contributes 1 point to the total score, yielding a PEDro scale score that can range from 0 to 10. B, the level of evidence was B (randomized control trials that lacked double-blinding).