Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 19;2016(10):CD005088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005088.pub4

Sakkers 2004.

Methods Single centre, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled RCT.
Parallel trial.
Participants 34 children (16 male) were randomised.
 Age range: 3 ‐ 18 years.
 OI types I, III and IV.
Interventions Oral olpadronate versus placebo.
 Dosage: 10 mg/m2 daily.
 Trial period: 24 months.
Outcomes Fractures, spinal BMC, spinal BMD, calcaneal BMC, calcaneal BMD, muscle strength, self care, mobility, height (body and seated), arm span, head circumference, body weight, heights of each lumbar vertebral body, urinary analysis, blood samples (but only 9 from each group).
 Adverse effects reported.
BMC and BMD of the lumbar spine (L1 – L4) and of the os calcis were measured before randomisation, after 1 year, and at the end of the trial. Domains of functional outcome were measured at the beginning of the trial and every 6 months, and anthropometric and radiographic variables were measured every 12 months. All laboratory assessments were done at baseline and at 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months.
Notes Allocation of intervention by computer‐generated randomisation.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated randomisation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Researchers were not aware of treatment allocation. Generation of the randomisation sequence was done independently of the researchers by an outside group. For each participant the Julius Centre was contacted by telephone for treatment allocation.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double blinded (outcome assessors blind).
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk An intention‐to‐treat analysis was undertaken. 2 participants (1 placebo and 1 treatment) withdrew from the trial but were accounted for in the final analysis. Consort diagram presented.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Reported no significant change in biochemical markers of bone and mineral metabolism and narratively reported no differences in seated height or radiographic assessments of lumbar vertebral height between olpadronate and placebo at 24 months follow up.
Other bias Low risk None.