| Methods | Randomized controlled trial. | |
| Participants | Country: China. Number randomized: 160. Postrandomization dropout: 0 (0%). Mean age: 59.6 years. Females: 42 (26.3%). Pancreatic cancer: 53 (33.1%). Biliary cancer: 36 (22.5%). Duodenal cancer: 28 (17.5%). Ampullary cancer: 33 (20.6%). Chronic pancreatitis: 5 (3.1%). Pancreaticoduodenectomy: 160 (100%). Distal pancreatectomy: 0 (0%). Other pancreatic surgery: 0 (0%). Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
| Interventions | Participants (N = 160) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. Group 1: active drain (N = 82). Group 2: passive drain (N = 78). |
|
| Outcomes | Mortality, morbidity, wound infection, intra‐abdominal infection, various postoperative complications, reoperation, readmission, additional radiological intervention, and length of hospital stay. | |
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "we randomized our patients using a computer‐generated random number". |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no information provided. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "Patients were prospectively assigned a code and data were recorded in a database by two nurses". Comment: no information provided whether the 2 nurses were blinded. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: there were no postrandomization dropouts. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: all the primary outcomes were reported. There was some selective outcome reporting in the secondary outcomes, but the review authors considered this trial to be free of selective reporting for the primary outcomes. |
| Other bias | Low risk | Comment: the study appeared to be free of other sources of bias. |