Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 5;14(7):e0218874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218874

Table 2. Bias and limit-of-agreements between fully sampled and undersampled data (regional values).

 US Apical   Mid-ventricular   Basal  
    Bias 95% LOA Bias 95% LOA Bias 95% LOA
Radial velocity 2 -0.01 [-0.24, 0.20] -0.01 [-0.22, 0.19] 0.00 [-0.22, 0.20]
(cm/s) 4 -0.01 [-0.41, 0.39] -0.01 [-0.39, 0.38] -0.00 [-0.36, 0.40]
  8 -0.04 [-0.74, 0.78] -0.03 [-0.69, 0.85] -0.02 [-0.62, 0.86]
  16 -0.0 [-1.1, 1.3] -0.02 [-0.98, 1.41] 0.00 [-0.95, 1.47]
Long. velocity 2 0.01 [-0.24, 0.26] -0.01 [-0.21, 0.26] -0.01 [-0.23, 0.27]
(cm/s) 4 0.02 [-0.41, 0.50] 0.01 [-0.40, 0.49] -0.03 [-0.48, 0.47]
  8 0.00 [-0.79, 0.99] -0.01 [-0.88, 0.94] -0.07 [-1.10, 0.95]
  16 0.0 [-1.2, 1.6] -0.0 [-1.4, 1.4] -0.0 [-1.6, 1.5]
Circ. strain 2 -0.0 [-1.5, 1.3] -0.0 [-1.4, 1.2] -0.0 [-1.3, 1.0]
 (%strain) 4 -0.0 [-2.1, 2.2] 0.0 [-1.7, 1.7] 0.0 [-1.9, 2.2]
  8 0.0 [-2.9, 6.2] 0.1 [-2.3, 4.2] 0.2 [-2.6, 3.5]
  16 0.3 [-4.5, 8.4] 0.5 [-3.0, 6.8] 0.5 [-2.8, 7.1]

Circumferential strain was calculated from temporal integration of the myocardial velocity field measured by TPM [5,20].

US = undersampling factor. LOA = limits of agreement.