Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 7;20(7):1418–1429. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz011

Table 3.

Details of PRP treatment protocols and control

Follow-up, mo WOMAC No. of Studies No. of Cases PRP/HA MD (95% CI) Heterogeneity, P; I2 P Value of Effect Size, Z (P)
1 Pain 3 108/114 (–0.65 to 0.27) 0.05; 67% 0.80 (0.42)
Stiffness 2 58/64 −0.13 (–0.41 to 0.15) 0.21; 35% 0.89 (0.37)
Function 2 58/64 −2.35 (–5.28 to 0.57) 0.12; 59% 1.57 (0.12)
Total 3 119/124 −3.81 (–7.98 to 0.36) 0.03; 71% 1.79 (0.07)
3 Pain 4 129/138 −0.31 (–1.16 to 0.54) <0.0001; 88% 0.72 (0.47)
Stiffness 3 80/88 −0.35 (–0.63 to −0.08) 0.44; 0% 2.50 (0.01)
Function 4 80/88 −1.92 (–2.57 to −1.27) 0.80; 0% 5.82 (<0.000001)
Total 5 155/163 −5.02 (–10.79 to 0.76) <0.00001; 89% 1.70 (0.09)
6 Pain 6 270/263 −1.24 (–1.94 to −0.53) <0.0001; 83% 3.42 (0.0006)
Stiffness 5 221/213 −0.46 (–0.92 to 0.01) 0.04; 60% 1.93 (0.05)
Function 5 221/213 −3.71 (–7.21 to −0.22) <0.0001; 84% 2.08 (0.04)
Total 7 296/288 −10.78 (–17.51 to −4.04) <0.00001; 94% 3.13 (0.002)
12 Pain 5 232/218 −1.75 (–2.50 to −1.01) <0.00001; 89% 4.61 (<0.000001)
Stiffness 4 183/168 −0.99 (–1.57 to −0.42) 0.001; 81% 3.40 (0.0007)
Function 4 183/168 −8.90 (–14.82 to −2.99) <0.00001; 94% 2.95 (0.003)
Total 4 183/168 −12.11 (–20.21 to −4.01) <0.00001; 94% 2.93 (0.003)