Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 24;13(6):e0007535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007535

Table 1. Characteristics of the study subpopulations.

P. vivax malaria patients HBV
patients
healthy
controls
Variables asymptomatic symptomatic HBV coinfected
N 145* 179 28 29 165*
Male–no. (%) 63 (45.65) 100 (55.87) 16 (57.14) 16 (55.17) 72 (47.37)
Age–yrs. a
 Median 43 32 30.5 38 39
 Interquartile interval 34–51.25 24–47 22.5–45.75 22.5–45.75 25–51 θ
*Previous malaria episodes b
 Median 17 5 18 12 13
 Interquartile interval 13–20 1–11 10.25–25 10.25–14 10–18 θ
Previous HBV–no. (%) 18 (13.04) 38 (21.23) ___ ___ ___
Years resident in the area–no. (%) c
 <2yrs. 25 (18.11) 52 (29.05) 2 (7.14) 3 (10.35) 39 (25.66)
 3-10yrs. 14 (10.15) 46 (25.70) 3 (10.72) 4 (13.79) 16 (10.52)
 >10yrs. 99 (71.74) 81 (45.25) 23 (82.14) 22 (75.86) 97 (63.82)
Parasitemia (count/μL) a,d __ __
 Median 0 6324 753
 Interquartile interval 0–32 913.5–60,623 444.3–4,262

Frequency data were compared using the chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test.

*From 165 and 145 subjects recruited as endemic controls and asymptomatic P. vivax patients, respectively, only 152 and 138 had all the epidemiological data available. One symptomatic vivax malaria and 17 HBV patients could not recall the number of previous malaria episodes. HBSAg, HBeAg, total anti-HBS, total anti-HBc, anti-HBc IgM and anti-HBe IgG were screened, and no acute HBV infection was detected.

a = Differences were significant between asymptomatic against other P. vivax infected patients.

b = Differences were significant between symptomatic against other P. vivax infected patients.

c = Differences were significant between the proportions.

d = Differences between symptomatic vivax malaria and coinfected were significant on Mann-Whitney U test analysis.

θ = Differences were significant between controls and both symptomatic or asymptomatic vivax malaria patients.