Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 17;21(3):300–308. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty220

Table 1.

Logistic Regression Predicting 30-d Tobacco Use Among US Young Adults (18–24 y)

Main effects model Sample Cigarettes E-cigarettes Cigars Smokeless
Variable % or M (SD) % or M aOR (95% CI) % or M aOR (95% CI) % or M aOR (95% CI) % or M aOR (95% CI)
Ad liking
 Did not like ads 83.2% Ref 83.7% Ref 85.8% Ref 87.8% Ref
 Liked one ad 11.0% 2.61 (2.19 to 3.12) 9.4% 1.78 (1.49 to 2.13) 8.1% 2.32 (1.91 to 2.82) 6.9% 2.18 (1.60 to 2.98)
 Liked multiple ads 5.8% 2.75 (2.20 to 3.45) 7.0% 2.07 (1.67 to 2.58) 6.1% 3.40 (2.79 to 4.15) 5.3% 4.68 (3.43 to 6.40)
Age 21.1 (2.0) 21.3 1.20 (1.16 to 1.24) 21.1 1.07 (1.03 to 1.11) 21.0 1.02 (0.99 to 1.06) 20.9 1.01 (0.96 to 1.06)
Sex
 Female 49.7% 23.8% Ref 9.2% Ref 10.1% Ref 0.7% Ref
 Male 50.3% 33.8% 1.77 (1.57 to 1.99) 15.7% 1.85 (1.63 to 2.10) 20.8% 2.57 (2.25 to 2.94) 9.9% 14.73 (10.31 to 21.04)
Sexual orientation
 Straight 91.2% 27.7% Ref 12.0% Ref 15.0% Ref 5.6% Ref
 LGB 8.8% 40.8% 1.58 (1.28 to 1.94) 17.7% 1.47 (1.19 to 1.82) 20.2% 1.35 (1.10 to 1.66) 2.6% 0.73 (0.44 to 1.21)
Race/ethnicity
 White 55.0% 31.7% Ref 14.0% Ref 15.0% Ref 8.2% Ref
 Hispanic 20.8% 26.5% 0.57 (0.49 to 0.66) 11.8% 0.70 (0.58 to 0.85) 15.1% 0.88 (0.73 to 1.06) 2.3% 0.20 (0.14 to 0.28)
 Black 13.2% 25.7% 0.62 (0.51 to 0.75) 7.8% 0.50 (0.39 to 0.63) 22.8% 1.64 (1.34 to 2.02) 0.8% 0.07 (0.04 to 0.14)
 Asian 7.2% 14.9% 0.41 (0.29 to 0.58) 9.5% 0.76 (0.55 to 1.07) 2.9% 0.20 (0.10 to 0.39) X X
 Multi 3.4% 36.5% 1.06 (0.81 to 1.37) 15.6% 0.99 (0.72 to 1.35) 23.3% 1.55 (1.21 to 1.99) 5.1% 0.51 (0.30 to 0.87)
Education
 <HS/GED 15.4% 35.6% 5.01 (3.96 to 6.33) 7.5% 2.93 (2.03 to 4.23) 7.6% 2.41 (1.73 to 3.34) 4.0% 3.14 (1.75 to 5.66)
 HS Graduate 28.2% 26.1% 2.96 (2.41 to 3.63) 6.1% 2.11 (1.51 to 2.95) 5.5% 1.89 (1.40 to 2.57) 3.9% 2.68 (1.65 to 4.34)
 SC/A 43.2% 23.2% 2.07 (1.69 to 2.55) 7.6% 1.88 (1.33 to 2.68) 6.4% 1.73 (1.27 to 2.37) 3.1% 1.85 (1.12 to 3.08)
 B/A 13.2% 8.6% Ref 2.8% Ref 3.9% Ref 1.6% Ref
Poverty level
 Below poverty 47.4% 36.9% 1.67 (1.43 to 1.96) 8.6% 1.30 (1.09 to 1.55) 9.7% 1.29 (1.12 to 1.49) 3.0% 1.05 (0.83 to 1.33)
 Near poverty 20.8% 27.2% 1.52 (1.28 to 1.80) 7.3% 1.30 (1.06 to 1.60) 6.0% 1.26 (1.05 to 1.51) 3.3% 1.05 (0.79 to 1.40)
 Twice poverty 31.8% 14.2% Ref 4.5% Ref 4.3% Ref 3.1% Ref
Military service
 Never served 98.5% 21.7% Ref 5.9% Ref 5.5% Ref 2.8% Ref
 served 1.5% 20.5% 1.59 (1.12 to 2.25) 5.1% 1.46 (0.93 to 2.30) 6.8% 0.77 (0.52 to 1.16) 4.4% 1.32 (0.72 to 2.43)
Internalizing
 Low 38.5% 17.0% Ref 4.1% Ref 4.5% Ref 3.0% Ref
 Moderate 29.2% 19.9% 1.06 (0.92 to 1.21) 5.3% 0.97 (0.82 to 1.16) 5.2% 0.99 (0.84 to 1.16) 2.7% 0.59 (0.46 to 0.75)
 High 32.3% 36.6% 1.61 (1.38 to 1.88) 11.1% 1.41 (1.19 to 1.67) 9.4% 1.38 (1.16 to 1.64) 3.5% 0.72 (0.54 to 0.95)
Externalizing
 Low 46.9% 18.9% Ref 4.7% Ref 4.7% Ref 2.8% Ref
 Moderate 35.6% 24.8% 1.02 (0.90 to 1.16) 7.2% 1.05 (0.87 to 1.27) 6.8% 1.23 (1.05 to 1.45) 2.9% 0.93 (0.73 to 1.19)
 High 17.5% 39.1% 1.35 (1.14 to 1.60) 12.6% 1.51 (1.23 to 1.85) 12.1% 1.62 (1.31 to 2.00) 5.0% 1.37 (1.02 to 1.86)

Ads = advertisements, B/A = bachelor’s or advanced degree, CI = confidence interval, HS = high school, LGB = lesbian, gay, bisexual, or something else, M = mean, aOR = adjusted odds ratio, Ref = reference group, SC/A = some college or associate degree, SD = standard deviation, X = dropped from analysis (small cell sizes). Weighted percentages are those within the category (eg, females) that had engaged in 30-d tobacco use. The remainder (ie, those who did not engage in 30-d tobacco use) would bring the total to 100%. Means are for individuals who engaged in 30-d tobacco use. Adjusted odds ratios have been adjusted for all covariates.