Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 6;18:34. doi: 10.1186/s12937-019-0461-3

Table 2.

GRADE assessment of the outcomes

Certainty assessment № of patients Effect Certainty
No. of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Zn Placebo Absolute (95% CI)
Number connection test
 3 randomized trials seriousa not serious not serious not serious publication bias strongly suspected strong associationb 116 111 SMD 0.97 lower (1.75 lower to 0.19 lower) Inline graphicMODERATE
Digital symbol test
 2 randomized trials seriousa not serious not serious seriousc publication bias strongly suspected strong associationb 70 67 SMD 0.44 higher (0.12 lower to 1 higher) Inline graphic VERY LOW
Serum ammonia lev
 2 randomized trials seriousa not serious not serious seriousc publication bias strongly suspected strong associationb 70 67 MD 10.86 lower (25.73 lower to 4.01 higher) Inline graphic VERY LOW

CI Confidence interval, SMD Standardized mean difference, MD Mean difference

Explanations

aWe downgraded by one level for serious risk of bias: one study was unblinded

bPublication bias was not assessed due to the limited numbers of included trials

cWe downgraded by one level for serious imprecision: the wide confidence interval contains significant benefits and harm