Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 5;17:50. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0382-4

Table 4.

Regression analysis of the physician’s choice on the practice location between large and small hospitals

Dependent variable Ordered probit model: hospital size
(1) (2)
Higher education
 College diploma (dummy) 0.513*** (0.017) 0.559*** (0.022)
 Bachelor degree or above (dummy) 1.759*** (0.016) 1.717*** (0.027)
Age 0.018*** (0.001) 0.019*** (0.001)
Male − 0.381*** (0.013) − 0.406*** (0.022)
Cut1 Constant 0.590*** (0.029) − 24.252 (596.049)
Cut2 Constant 1.860*** (0.030) − 19.456 (596.048)
Cut3 Constant 3.012*** (0.032) − 5.556 (576.072)
Fixed effects COUNTY
Number of observations 36 674 36 674
Log-likelihood function − 4.03e+04 − 1.25e+04
Chi squared 14 936.433*** 70 457.985***
Pseudo R-squared 0.156 0.738
BIC 80 659.477 26 115.339

Source: 2009 Fujian province database is a cross-sectional database that collected basic characteristics of human resources for health in all of the health institutes

*** denote statistical significance at the 1% levels. standard errors are reported in the parentheses

cut1—this is the estimated cutpoint on the latent variable used to differentiate township-level hospital from county-level, city-level, and provincial-level hospitals when values of the predictor variables are evaluated at zero

cut2—this is the estimated cutpoint on the latent variable used to differentiate township-level and county-level hospital from city-level and provincial-level hospitals when values of the predictor variables are evaluated at zero

cut3—this is the estimated cutpoint on the latent variable used to differentiate township-level, county-level, and city-level hospitals from provincial level hospitals when values of the predictor variables are evaluated at zero