Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 5;20:140. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1091-1

Table 5.

Incidence and severity of bleeding regarding bronchoscopic intervention

Technique
Cryobiopsy (N = 359) Forceps biopsy (N = 359)
Bleeding severity None/Mild Moderate/Severe None/Mild Moderate/Severe p- value
Clinical relevance Low High Low High
Intervention – no (%) 301 (83.8) 58 (16.2) 344 (95.8) 15 (4.2) TBCB vs TBFB < 0.001
Probe size
 Cryobiopsy 357
  Small: 1.9 mm 211 187 25

SC vs. LC: p = 0.006

SC vs. LF: p < 0.001

  Large: 2.4 mm 146 112 33
 Forceps 355
  Small: 1.8–2.0 mm 169 165 4 SF vs. LF: p = 0.12
  Large: 2.2–2.6 mm 186 175 11
Localization of biopsy
 Upper lobe 48 13 p = 1.0
 Lower lobe 112 32
 Upper lobe 49 4 p = 0.27
 Lower lobe 109 4

*Clinical relevance of bleeding is categorized as “low” (None, and mild bleeding) and “high” (moderate and severe bleeding) for both biopsy techniques. Absolute number of evaluable patients is listed in the second column. P-values were calculated by 2 tail Fisher’s exact test for independent samples, comparing small cryobiopsy (SC) and large cryobiopsy (LC), small forceps biopsy (SF) and large forceps biopsy (LF) as well as small cryobiopsy (SC) and large forceps biopsy (LF)