Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Jun 10;4(8):617–626. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30121-7

Table 3:

Efficacy results after treatment with LUM/IVA for 24 weeks in patients with ppFEV1 <70 vs ≥70 at screening

Parameter Placebo LUM 600 mg qd/IVA 250 mg q12h LUM 400 mg q12h/IVA 250 mg q12h
ppFEV1 at screening*
<70
(n=244)
≥70
(n=109)
<70
(n=241)
≥70
(n=119)
<70
(n=245)
≥70
(n=114)
Absolute change in ppFEV1
 Within group LS mean (SE) −0∙5 (0∙4) 0∙1 (0∙8)
 LS mean vs placebo (95% CI), percentage points 3∙3 (2∙1–4∙4) 3∙3 (1∙3–5∙4) 3∙3 (2∙1–4∙4) 1∙9 (−0∙2–4∙0)
 p value <0∙001 0∙002 <0∙001 0∙079
Relative change in ppFEV1
 Within group LS mean (SE) −0∙3 (0∙9) 0∙7 (1∙1)
 LS mean vs placebo (95% CI), % 6∙0 (3∙7–8∙2) 4∙4 (1∙5–7∙4) 5∙9 (3∙6–8∙2) 2∙5 (−0∙5–5∙5)
 p value <0∙001 0∙003 <0∙001 0∙103
Relative increase of ≥5% from baseline in ppFEV1
 Odds ratio vs placebo (95% CI) 2∙5 (1∙7–3∙7) 3∙8 (2∙1–6∙8) 2∙4 (1∙6–3∙5) 1∙9 (1∙0–3∙4)
 p value <0∙001 <0∙001 <0∙001 0∙045
Body mass index
 Within group LS mean (SE) 0∙1 (0∙1) 0∙1 (0∙1)
 LS mean vs placebo (95% CI), kg/m2 0∙2 (0∙0–0∙4) 0∙4 (0∙2–0∙7) 0∙2 (0∙0–0∙3) 0∙3 (0∙1–0∙6)
 p value 0∙017 <0∙001 0∙041 0∙006
CFQ-R respiratory domain
 Within group LS mean (SE) 1∙5 (1∙1) 1∙7 (1∙4)
 LS mean vs placebo (95% CI), points 4∙1 (1∙3–6∙9) 1∙9 (−1∙9–5∙7) 1∙9 (−0∙9–4∙7) 3∙6 (−0∙3–7∙4)
 p value 0∙005 0∙326 0∙184 0∙071
*

Eighty-one patients had ppFEV1 that decreased to <40 between screening and baseline.

Assessed by averaging the mean values from weeks 16 and 24, according to the prespecified statistical analysis plan.

Average relative increase from baseline at weeks 16 and 24.

CFQ-R=Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised; CI=confidence interval; IVA=ivacaftor; LUM=lumacaftor; LS=least squares; ppFEV1=percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second; SE=standard error; q12h=every 12 hours; qd=every day.