Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Health. 2019 Aug;44(4):740–748. doi: 10.1007/s10900-019-00661-6

Table 6:

Community Engagement in Research Activities (CERA)1920 index, CBPR principal investigators’ responses to, “What category best describes the community partners’ role in each of the following activities?”

No CP participation N (%) CPs < PIs N (%) CPs = PIs N (%) CPs > PIs N (%)
Determining who the community partners would include 7 (6) 11 (9) 61 (50) 42 (35)
Identifying research problem to address 8 (7) 28 (23%) 71 (59%) 14 (12)
Choosing project’s research methods 11 (9) 64 (53) 42 (35) 4 (3)
Developing project’s intervention 5 (4) 27 (23) 69 (59) 16 (14)
Implementing intervention(s) 1 (1) 18 (15) 62 (53) 36 (31)
Deciding what information to collect from participants 7 (6) 45 (37) 62 (51) 7 (6)
Designing questionnaires and other data collection procedures 10 (8) 66 (54) 42 (35) 3 (3)
Recruitment and retention of project participants 4 (3) 21 (17) 47 (39) 49 (41)
Collecting project data 9 (7) 43 (36) 41 (34) 28 (23)
Analyzing project data 30 (25) 69 (57) 21 (17) 1 (1)
Interpreting findings from analyses 13 (11) 50 (41) 54 (45) 4 (3)
Planning project results dissemination efforts 6 (5) 27 (22) 71 (59) 17 (14)
Presenting project findings at scientific conferences 15 (12) 59 (49) 41 (34) 6 (5)
Writing scientific papers on project findings 18 (15) 79 (65) 19 (17) 5 (4)
Informing community about project findings 5 (4) 24 (20) 58 (48) 34 (28)
Informing relevant policy makers on project findings 10 (8) 26 (22) 54 (45) 30 (25)
Ensuring project findings are put into community practice 5 (4) 15 (13) 49 (49) 41 (34)
Developing new sources of funding to continue work begun by project 19 (16) 46 (38) 42 (35) 13 (11)
Maintaining continuation of partnership after NIH funding ends 12 (10) 31 (26) 68 (57) 9 (7)