Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 13;105(1):122–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.05.014

Table 2.

DTC Tests Ordered and DTC Testing Motivations

Variable Overall All Tool Users Non-health Only Tools Crossover Health Only Tools Test Statistica p Valuea
Number of respondents 1,137 820 263 458 98

DTC Tests Ordered (%)

23andMe 62.4 61.7 40.7 68.1 87.8 85.3 <2.2e−16
AncestryDNA 53.9 59.8 73.0 62.0 14.3 104.5 <2.2e−16
FamilyTreeDNA 26.8 30.2 37.3 32.1 3.1 41.2 1.14e−09

Rating of DTC Testing Motivationsb(% Very Important)

General curiosity 68.0 67.6 55.5 71.4 82.7 30.7 2.1e−07
Ancestry 66.0 66.3 69.6 69.8 41.2 31.1 1.8e−07
Find relatives 46.9 49.9 62.4 50.4 14.3 66.1 4.4e−15
Risk for specific diseases 31.4 30.9 16.1 34.2 54.1 53.9 1.97e−12
Limited family health history 20.7 20.7 21.4 21.0 17.7 0.621 0.733
Other family members are using 10.7 10.7 10.8 11.0 8.3 0.656 0.720
Participate in research 32.3 31.6 26.3 33.8 34.7 4.79 0.0911
Raw genetic data file 50.8 53.1 44.4 56.4 60.4 11.9 0.00263

Comparisons of DTC tests ordered and DTC testing motivations, overall and grouped by type(s) of tools used.

a

Comparing non-health only tool users, crossover tool users, and health-only tool users. Test statistics and p values are from chi-square tests.

b

Responses to DTC testing motivations were dichotomized into “very important” versus “somewhat important” or “not at all important.”