Skip to main content
. 2019 May 21;20(7):15–27. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12623

Table 3.

The comparison of plan quality using dose‐volume‐histogram (DVH) indices.

DVH index VMAT IMPT P‐value
CTVhigh D2cm3 (normalized) 105% 104% 0.071
CTVhigh D5%–D95% (normalized) 4.0% 3.5% 0.12
CTVlow D95% (normalized) 103% 101% 0.11
Liver V30Gy[RBE] (%) 8.05% 3.97% 0.0023
Liver Dmean (Gy[RBE]) 15.27 2.58 <0.0001
Lung Dmean (Gy[RBE]) 8.55 3.73 <0.0001
Lung V5Gy[RBE] (%) 48.11% 15.61% <0.0001
Lung V20Gy[RBE] (%) 10.32% 8.57% 0.50
Heart Dmean (Gy[RBE]) 21.94 7.63 <0.0001
Heart V20Gy[RBE] (%) 51.06% 15.61% <0.0001
Heart V30Gy[RBE] (%) 18.52% 11.48% 0.061
Heart V40Gy[RBE] (%) 8.38% 6.31% 0.21
Cord Dmax (Gy[RBE]) 36.00 38.92 0.38
Cord D0.03cm3 (Gy[RBE]) 35.05 37.49 0.48
Kidney V18Gy[RBE] (%) 3.88% 0.41% 0.27
Stomach V45Gy[RBE] (cm3) 79.92 45.71 0.093

CTV, clinical target volume; IMPT, intensity‐modulated proton therapy; VMAT, volumetric‐modulated arc therapy.

Bold values represent significant difference between IMPT and VMAT DVH indices.