Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 4;20(4):129–138. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.244

Table 2.

Characteristics of five major trials of intensive vs standard glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes

Trial UKPDS 3316 UKPDS 3417 ACCORD18 ADVANCE19 VADT20
Year 1998 1998 2008 2008 2009
No. of participants 3867 753 10 251 11 140 1791
Baseline
Age, y 53 53 62 66 60
Men, % 61 46 61 58 3
Body mass index, kg/m2 28 32 32 28 31
Duration of diabetes, y Newly diagnosed Newly diagnosed 10 8 11.5
HbA1c at baseline, % 7.1 7.2 8.3 7.5 9.4
Treatment protocol
Intervention Sulfonylurea or insulin Metformin Not specified Gliclazide Not specified
Follow‐up, y 11.1 10.7 3.5 5 5.6
HbA1c achieved, %, I vs Ca 7.0 vs 7.9 7.4 vs 8.0 6.4 vs 7.5 6.5 vs 7.3 6.9 vs 8.4
Outcomes
Primary outcome Any diabetes‐related endpoint Any diabetes‐related endpoint Combined incidence of major macrovascular events Combined incidence of major macrovascular or microvascular events Combined incidence of macrovascular or heart failure events
HR or RR for primary outcome (95% CI) RR, 0.88 (0.79‐0.99) RR, 0.68 (0.53‐0.87) HR, 0.9 (0.78‐1.04) HR, 0.9 (0.82‐0.98) Macrovascular events only: 0.94 (0.84‐1.06) HR, 0.88 (0.74‐1.05)
HR or RR for all‐cause mortality (95% CI) HR, 0.94 (0.80‐1.10) RR, 0.64 (0.45‐0.91) HR, 1.22 (1.01‐1.46) HR, 0.93 (0.83‐1.06) HR, 1.07 (0.81‐1.42)
HR or RR for microvascular outcome (95% CI) RR, 0.75 (0.60‐0.93) RR, 0.71 (0.42‐1.19) No difference HR, 0.86 (0.77‐0.97) No difference

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c; HR, hazard ratio; RR, relative risk.

a

I vs C, intensive vs control arm.