Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 5;35(14):i200–i207. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz376

Table 5.

Performance on synthetic 16S rRNA datasets (only Nanopore 2D reads were used for evaluation)

Dataset (# reads) Tool # consensus # mappable reads (mappable ratio %) Error rate (%) Run time (CPU min)
TideHunter 3860 3853 (99.8) 4.4 4.7
Simplea (14 580) INC-seq 2178 2174 (99.8) 4.8 119.0
TRF 2542 2540 (99.9) 4.5 14.5
TideHunter 1596 1590 (99.6) 3.1 1.5
Rep.1b (7 444) INC-seq 1076 1074 (99.8) 4.7 50.4
TRF 1360 1356 (99.7) 3.5 5.5
TideHunter 1564 1558 (99.6) 3.0 1.5
Rep.2c (2 904) INC-seq 1183 1178 (99.6) 4.3 43.9
TRF 1330 1326 (99.7) 3.4 4.8
a

Simple: simple community dataset with 3 bacteria.

b

Rep.1: replicate 1 of 10 bacteria community.

c

Rep.2: replicate 2 of 10 bacteria community.