Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 2;12:5201–5213. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S204403

Table 2.

Pooled and subgroup analyses of data synthesis of overall survival for this meta-analysis

Categories Study (case) Model HR (95% CI) Z PZ Heterogeneity Pm
I2 Ph
Overall survival (OS) 16 (8853) Random 1.70 (1.37–2.09) 4.96 <0.001 85.4% <0.001
Study population 0.105
 Asian 13 (7708) Random 1.73 (1.35–2.22) 4.32 <0.001 87.1% <0.001
 Caucasian 3 (1145) Random 1.59 (1.05–2.42) 2.17 0.030 79.4% 0.008
Cancer type 0.090
 RCC 6 (4624) Random 1.64 (1.30–2.05) 4.26 <0.001 55.6% 0.046
 Liver cancer 4 (1900) Random 1.16 (1.04–1.29) 2.75 0.006 95.1% <0.001
 UTUC 2 (1632) Fixed 1.96 (1.53–2.51) 5.31 <0.001 0.0% 0.538
 Bladder cancer 2 (267) Fixed 2.66 (1.69–4.20) 4.21 <0.001 0.0% 0.910
 Others 2 (430) Fixed 1.44 (1.18–1.76) 3.62 <0.001 26.8% 0.242
Primary treatment 0.783
 Surgery 13 (8063) Random 1.74 (1.34–2.25) 4.21 <0.001 88.0% <0.001
 None surgery 3 (790) Fixed 1.50 (1.26–1.78) 4.61 <0.001 0.0% 0.374
Clinical stage 0.111
 I-IV 4 (1758) Random 1.65 (1.15–2.35) 2.74 0.006 70.5% 0.017
 T1-T4 5 (4513) Fixed 1.89 (1.59–2.25) 7.26 <0.001 0.0% 0.450
 IV 3 (552) Fixed 1.83 (1.43–2.34) 4.79 <0.001 0.0% 0.695
 Others 4 (2030) Random 1.17 (1.06–1.29) 3.11 0.003 94.9% <0.001
Cutoff value 0.114
 >1.3 8 (6275) Random 1.48 (1.08–2.02) 2.44 0.015 89.4% <0.001
 ≤1.3 8 (2578) Fixed 1.78 (1.59–2.00) 9.79 <0.001 0.0% 0.550
Analysis method 0.890
 Univariate 4 (1322) Random 1.56 (1.20–2.04) 3.32 0.001 68.8% 0.022
 Multivariate 12 (7531) Random 1.76 (1.33–2.33) 3.95 <0.001 87.6% <0.001
Sample size 0.586
 ≥200 10 (8019) Random 1.50 (1.17–1.92) 3.20 0.001 89.1% <0.001
 <200 6 (834) Fixed 2.18 (1.75–2.72) 6.96 <0.001 0.0% 0.899

Notes: PZ denotes P-value for statistical significance based on Z test; Ph denotes P-value for heterogeneity based on Q test; Pm denotes P-value for statistical outcome based on multivariate meta-regression analysis.

Abbreviations: RCC, renal cell carcinoma; UTUC, urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.