Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 1;12:1853–1867. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S180905

Table 1.

In vitro activity of ceftolozane–tazobactam against clinical isolates from intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections

Source Pathogen Number of isolates TOL/TAZ MIC50 (µg/mL; range) TOL/TAZ MIC90 (µg/mL; range) TOL/TAZ S%a
Aerobic Gram-negative organisms isolated from intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in hospitals in Europe and the USA (2012)29 Escherichia coli 1,674 0.25 0.5 98.5–99.9
MDR E. coli 85 0.5 2 to >32 75–98.6
K. pneumoniae 442 0.25 16 88.9–89.6
MDR K. pneumoniae 78 16 >32 NR
Enterobacter spp. 228 0.25–0.5 4–8 NR
Citrobacter spp. 113 0.25 2 NR
Proteus mirabilis 117 0.5 0.5 NR
P. aeruginosa 327 0.5 4 93.4–95.7
MDR P. aeruginosa 59 2–4 >32 65–73.7
XDR P. aeruginosa 43 4–8 >32 56.7–61.5
CAZ-NS P. aeruginosa 61 2–4 >32 60–80.8
MEM-NS P. aeruginosa 77 2 >32 75.5–79.2
Pathogen Number of isolates TOL/TAZ MIC50 (µg/mL) TOL/TAZ MIC90 (µg/mL) TOL/TAZ S% (CLSI/EUCAST)
Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections in Europe (2012–2015)30 Enterobacteriaceae 5,950 0.25 1 93.5/91.3
ESBL non-CRE phenotype 906 0.5 8 82.8/74.9
Escherichia coli 3,460 0.25 0.5 98.8/98
ESBL non-CRE phenotype 559 0.5 2 92.7/87.8
K. pneumoniae 917 0.25 >32 79.3/75.8
ESBL phenotype 373 4 >32 49.1/41.6
ESBL non-CRE phenotype 280 1 >32 65.4/55.4
Enterobacter spp. 432 0.5 8 78/69.7
Enterobacter cloacae 278 0.5 16 76.6/70.1
Citrobacter koseri 101 0.25 0.5 100/100
Citrobacter freundii 111 0.25 8 79.3/78.4
P. mirabilis 368 0.5 0.5 97.3/95.7
ESBL phenotype 32 1 8 71.9/56.2
Indole-positive Proteeae 237 0.25 1 97.5/94.9
Serratia spp. 77 0.5 2 98.7/88.3
P. aeruginosa 603 0.5 4 91.7/91.7
CAZ-NS P. aeruginosa 139 4 >32 65.5/65.5
MEM-NS P. aeruginosa 126 2 >32 65.9/65.9
PIP/TAZ-NS P. aeruginosa 162 2 >32 70.4/70.4

Notes: aPercentage of isolates inhibited at an MIC of ceftolozane-tazobactam of ≤8 mg/L. Adapted with permission from Sader HS, Farrell DJ, Flamm RK, Jones RN. Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity tested against aerobic Gram-negative organisms isolated from intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in European and United States hospitals (2012). J Infect. 2014;69(3):266–277. Copyright © 2014 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.29 And from: Pfaller MA, Bassetti M, Duncan LR, Castanheira M. Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosacausing urinary tract and intraabdominal infections in Europe: report from an antimicrobial surveillance programme (2012–15). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(5):1386–1395. © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.30

Abbreviations: TOL/TAZ, ceftolozane–tazobactam; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; S, susceptible; MDR, multidrug-resistant; XDR, extensively drug-resistant; CAZ-NS, ceftazidime-non-susceptible; MEM-NS, meropenem-non-susceptible; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; PIP/TAZ-NS, piperacillin–tazobactam-non-susceptible.