Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 1;9:55–78. doi: 10.2147/DNND.S208815

Table 4.

Intravenous methylprednisolone (Comparing different doses)

Study/N/Age/Location Intervention and treatment duration Summary of efficacy results
Fierro et al (2002)27
N=24
Mean age, years: low-dose group: 31.3; high-dose group: 32.4
Italy
Intervention
IVMP 1 g/day (n=9) vs IVMP 2 g/day (n=12)
Treatment duration
5 days
Assessments
Just before (T0) treatment onset and after 7 (T7) and 21 days (T21)
EDSS improvement
Baseline EDSS, mean (SD)
Low-dose group: 4.0 (1.1)
High-dose group: 3.8 (1.1)
EDSS scores significantly improved in both groups throughout follow-up perioda
T7: ~80% of basal mean EDSS
T21: ~70% of basal mean EDSS
Wilcoxon’s matched pairs test:
  • High-dose group T0 vs T7: P=0.009

  • High-dose group T0 vs T21: P=0.01

  • Low-dose group T0 vs T7: P=0.02

  • Low-dose group T0 vs T21: P=0.008


ANOVA:
  • High-dose group P=0.0004

  • Low-dose group P=0.0008

La Mantia et al (1990)30
N=24
Age: NR
Italy
Intervention
IV dexamethasone (n= NR) vs IVMP high dose (n= NR) vs IVMP low dose (n= NR)
Treatment duration
NR
Assessments
Days 7, 14, and 30 following treatment onset as well as 3 and 6 months after treatment onset
EDSS improvement
Day 7 after treatment onset: frequency of improvement and extent of recovery was lower in the high-dose IVMP group vs the other groups
Day 30 after treatment onset: all patients treated with dexamethasone and high-dose IVMP had recovered; 1/3 patients with low-dose IVMP had recovered
La Mantia et al (1994)29
N=31
Mean age, years: DX: 27.4; HDMP: 31.1; LDMP: 30.1
Italy
Intervention
IV dexamethasone (n=11) vs high-dose IVMP (n=10) vs low-dose IVMP (n=10)
Treatment duration
14 days
Assessments
24 hrs before treatment onset
Days 2, 4, 7, and 14 following treatment completion, as well as 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months after treatment completion
EDSS score improvement (≥1 point):
Day 15: dexamethasone, 10/11 patients; high-dose IVMP, 8/10 patients; low-dose IVMP, 6/10 patients
1 month after treatment completion: dexamethasone, 10/11 patients; high-dose IVMP, 9/10 patients; low-dose IVMP, 4/10 patients
Oliveri et al (1998)28
N=31
Mean age, years: Group H: 27.2; Group L: 31.3
Italy
Intervention
IVMP 2 g/day (n= NR) vs IVMP 0.5 g/day (n= NR)
Treatment duration
5 days
Assessments
Baseline (T0) and follow-up days 7 (T7), 15 (T15), 30 (T30), and 60 (T60)
Clinical improvement (EDSS score) achieved during follow-up period in both groups (Friedman’s ANOVA: high dose, P<0.0001; low dose, P<0.0001).
Improvement for both groups was significant at T7 and maintained throughout follow-up period:
High dose:
T0: 3.93 (1.68)
T7: 2.90 (1.88)
T15: 2.66 (1.78)
T30: 2.32 (1.69)
T60: 2.25 (1.63)
Low dose:
T0: 3.5 (1.45)
T7: 3.13 (1.52)
T15: 2.76 (1.93)
T30: 2.46 (2.01)
T60: 2.35 (2.09)
Intragroup difference before and after treatment:
High dose (Wilcoxon’s matched pairs test):
T0 vs T7, P=0.005
T0 vs T15, P=0.002
T0 vs T30, P=0.0009
T0 vs T60, P=0.0009
Low dose (Wilcoxon’s matched pairs test):
T0 vs T7, P=0.005
T0 vs T15, P=0.002
T0 vs T30, P=0.002
T0 vs T60, P=0.001

Note: aEstimated from figure; actual values not reported.

Abbreviations: DX, dexamethasone; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; HDMP, high dose methylprednisolone; IV, intravenous; IVMP, intravenous methylprednisolone; LDMP, low-dose methylprednisolone; NR, not reported; T0= prior to start of treatment; TX, after X days from baseline.