Skip to main content
. 2019 May 14;26(Pt 4):991–997. doi: 10.1107/S1600577519003849

Table 2. Comparison of predicted and observed X-ray beam-induced heating.

The models used are described in the main text. The temperature change calculated using the basic model assumes 30 ms of exposure to X-rays (the approximate time taken to reach a steady-state temperature; Fig. 6). The KKT model and observed temperature rises are steady-state temperatures. The dose rate is calculated from the average diffraction-weighted dose reported by RADDOSE-3D.

          ΔT (K)
Sample Energy (keV) Sample size (µm) Cryogen Dose rate (MGy s−1) Basic model KKT model Observed
Ruby 9.2 20 Nitrogen 7.44 296 61.6 27
40 Nitrogen 5.16 205 120.6 58
Helium 5.16 205 50.5 39
12.8 20 Nitrogen 1.52 60 12.5 7
40 Nitrogen 1.08 43 25.2 21
Helium 1.08 43 10.5 15
Protein 9.2 20 Nitrogen 2.30 138 5.7
40 Nitrogen 1.68 101 11.8
Helium 1.68 101 5.0
12.8 20 Nitrogen 0.458 27 1.4
40 Nitrogen 0.336 138 2.4
Helium 0.336 138 1.0