Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 4;16(4):385–395. doi: 10.1177/1479164119827456

Table 4.

Adverse events.

Control group A
(n = 52)
Intervention group B
(n = 46)
Intervention group C
(n = 50)
Not randomised (n = 27) Total (N = 175)
Participants with adverse or serious adverse events 29 (55.8%) 30 (65.2%) 41 (82.0%) 2 (7.4%) 102 (58.3%)
Number of adverse or serious adverse events 61 64 121 2 248
Participants with serious adverse events 8 (15.4%) 7 (15.2%) 7 (14.0%) 0 22 (12.6%)
Number of serious adverse events 9 9 8 0 26
Participants with hypoglycaemia serious adverse eventsa 1 (1.9%) 0 0 0 1 (0.6%)
Number of hypoglycaemia serious adverse events 1 0 0 0 1
Participants with hypoglycaemia adverse eventsa (excluding serious) 0 1 (2.2%) 3 (6.0%) 0 4 (2.3%)
Number of hypoglycaemia adverse events (excluding serious) 0 1 3 0 4
Participants with device-related adverse eventsb 0 0 2 (4.0%) 0 2 (1.1%)
Number of device-related adverse eventsb 0 0 2 0 2
Participants with study procedure-related adverse eventsb 0 0 1 (2.0%) 0 1 (0.6%)
Number of study procedure-related adverse eventsb 0 0 1 0 1

Table includes the full analysis set. No serious adverse events were related to the study device or procedure.

a

No hypoglycaemic events were related to the device.

b

Device and/or study procedure adverse events were reported as ‘possibly related’ to sensor wear: one patient with superficial thrombophlebitis (mild) and one with redness (mild).