Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2019 May 16;30(8):819–826. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01178-y

Table 2.

Results of the three scenarios modeled for women receiving breast cancer screening in the NBCCEDP (n = 2,000,000 in each scenario)

Parameter Scenario
Program No program No screening
Mammograms (per woman) over lifetime 17.61 12.34 0.00
Mammograms (per woman) age 40–64, 1991–2006 4.23 2.41 0.00
Died of breast cancer 3.53% 3.93% 4.97%
Clinically detected rate 5.27% 7.17% 13.30%
Screen detected rate 8.55% 6.56% 0.00%
Overall detected rate 13.82% 13.73% 13.30%
Clinically detected
  Localized 52.0% 50.8% 48.0%
  Regional 41.7% 42.7% 44.7%
  Distant 6.3% 6.5% 7.3%
Screen detected
  Localized 81.1% 78.8%
  Regional 17.5% 19.6%
  Distant 1.4% 1.6%
Missed diagnostic follow-ups (per woman) 0.049 0.059 0.000
Costing information (per woman)
  Screening costs $2,635 $1,771 $0
  Diagnostic costs $342 $233 $0
  Treatment costs $5,689 $5,560 $5,258
  Patient navigation costs $126 $0 $0
  Total costs $8,791 $7,564 $5,258
Life-years (per woman) 21.990 21.965 21.915
QALYs (per woman) 21.969 21.945 21.898
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs)
  $ per life-year
  Versus no screening $47,489 $46,580
  Versus no program $49,296
  $ per QALY
  Versus no screening $50,223 $49,443
  Versus no program $51,754

Life-years and QALYs were rounded in the TreeAge software

NBCCEDP National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, QALYs quality-adjusted life-years